Thomas v. Young et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 39

JUDGMENT: In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 37 ) is adopted. (2) Plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendant John Hudson (doc. no. 35 ) is granted, and defendant John Hudson is dismissed from, and terminated as a party to, this case. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed and is referred back to the magistrate judge for additional proceedings with respect to the remaining defendants. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/16/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION QUARTEZ T. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. ROBIN YOUNG, C/O, et al., Defendants. QUARTEZ T. THOMAS, Plaintiff, v. ROBIN YOUNG, C/O, and M. SCOTT, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16cv357-MHT (WO) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16cv888-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate recommendation (doc. no. 37) is adopted. Judge's (2) Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendant John Hudson (doc. no. 35) is granted, and defendant John Hudson is dismissed from, and terminated as a party to, this case. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed and is referred back to the magistrate judge for additional proceedings with respect to the remaining defendants. DONE, this the 16th day of May, 2017. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?