Thomas v. Young et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
39
JUDGMENT: In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 37 ) is adopted. (2) Plaintiff's motion to dismiss defendant John Hudson (doc. no. 35 ) is granted, and defendant John Hudson is dismissed from, and terminated as a party to, this case. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed and is referred back to the magistrate judge for additional proceedings with respect to the remaining defendants. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/16/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(kh, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
QUARTEZ T. THOMAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBIN YOUNG, C/O, et al.,
Defendants.
QUARTEZ T. THOMAS,
Plaintiff,
v.
ROBIN YOUNG, C/O, and M.
SCOTT,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:16cv357-MHT
(WO)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:16cv888-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The
United
States
Magistrate
recommendation (doc. no. 37) is adopted.
Judge's
(2) Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendant John
Hudson (doc. no. 35) is granted, and defendant John
Hudson is dismissed from, and terminated as a party to,
this case.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is not closed and is referred back to the
magistrate
judge
for
additional
proceedings
with
respect to the remaining defendants.
DONE, this the 16th day of May, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?