Davis v. Alabama Department of Transportation et al
JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows:(1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 56 ) is adopted, with the exception noted in the opinion. (2) Defendants motion to dismiss (doc. no. [4 9]), as construed, is granted to the extent that plaintiffs complaint is dismissed without prejudice. All other pending motions are denied as moot. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed againstplaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/29/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
DWIGHT H. DAVIS,
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION, as a
person under U.S.C.
§ 1983; et al.,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
exception noted in the opinion.
(2) Defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. no. 49), as
construed, is granted to the extent that plaintiff’s
complaint is dismissed without prejudice.*
All other pending motions are denied as moot.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 29th day of September, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
recommendation or otherwise raised the issue, the court
does not address whether the tolling provision of 28
U.S.C. § 1367(d) applies to any of his state-law
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?