Steiger v. Strickland et al (INMATE 3)
Filing
73
JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The petitioner's 70 Objections are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judge's 62 Recommendation is adopted. (3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. nos. 22 and 27 ) is dismissed without prejudice becausepetitioner has failed to exhaust state remedies. (4) All pending motions are denied as moot, and all other pending objections are overruled. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed a gainst petitioner, for which execution may issue.The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 12/16/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
BRADLEY JOSEPH STEIGER,
Petitioner,
v.
MICHAEL STRICKLAND,
et al.,
Respondents.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
2:16cv594-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The petitioner's objections (doc. no. 70) are
overruled.
(2) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendation (doc. no. 62) is adopted.
(3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc.
nos. 22 & 27) is dismissed without prejudice because
petitioner has failed to exhaust state remedies.
(4) All pending motions are denied as moot, and all
other pending objections are overruled.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
petitioner, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 16th day of December, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?