Slater v. Flowers et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 19

ORDERED as follows: 1) The 14 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; 2) The claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B) (i); 3) Dft Alabama Department of Corrections is DISMISSED as a party to the complaint; and 4) This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 10/21/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION DEMON VICTORELL SLATER, #177 985, Plaintiff, v. CHIEF FLOWERS, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-627-WKW ) ) ) ) ORDER On September 21, 2016, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 14) to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 14) is ADOPTED; 2. The claims against the Alabama Department of Corrections are DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ยง1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3. Defendant Alabama Department of Corrections is DISMISSED as a party to the complaint; and 4. This case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE this 21st day of October, 2016. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?