McDonald v. Easterling Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 24

JUDGMENT: It is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's 5 Recommendation is adopted. (2) Plaintiff's claims against defendant Easterling Correctional Facility are dismissed with pr ejudice. (3) Defendant Easterling Correctional Facility is dismissed and terminated as a party to this case. It is further ORDERED that no costs are taxed. This case is not closed, and is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/3/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION OCTAVIUS T. MCDONALD, Plaintiff, v. EASTERLING CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16cv670-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The United States Magistrate Judge's recommendation (doc. no. 5) is adopted. (2) Plaintiff’s claims against defendant Easterling Correctional Facility are dismissed with prejudice. (3) Defendant Easterling Correctional Facility is dismissed and terminated as a party to this case. It is further ORDERED that no costs are taxed. This case is not closed, and is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. DONE, this the 3rd day of October, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?