Sorrells v. Jackson et al (INMATE 1)
Filing
5
ORDER that: 1. The 4 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. Nurse Wanda Pratt and Nurse Diane are DISMISSED as defendants in this cause of action. 3. The dismissal of Nurse Pratt and Nurse Diane is WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the rights of the plaintiff to file a separate civil action against these individuals regarding the constitutionality of medical treatment provided to him. 4. This case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Gray Borden for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Harold Albritton, III on 3/27/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
NORTHERN DIVISION
ALBERT J. SORRELLS,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
GREG JACKSON, et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-CV-83-WHA
ORDER
On February 21, 2017, the Magistrate Judge entered a Recommendation regarding the
proper parties in this case (Doc. No. 4).
No timely objections have been filed to this
Recommendation. After an independent review of the file in this case, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. Nurse Wanda Pratt and Nurse Diane are DISMISSED as defendants in this cause of
action.
3. The dismissal of Nurse Pratt and Nurse Diane is WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the rights
of the plaintiff to file a separate civil action against these individuals regarding the
constitutionality of medical treatment provided to him.
4. This case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Gray Borden for further proceedings.
DONE this 27th day of March, 2017.
/s/
W. Harold Albritton
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?