Lloyd v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
JUDGMENT: In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plf's 55 & 57 objections are overruled; (2) The 56 motion for oral argument (Doc. 56) is denied; (3) T he United States Magistrate Judge's 54 recommendation is adopted; (4) Dfts' 33 motion for summary judgment is granted; (5) Judgment is entered in favor of dfts and against plf, with plf taking nothing by his complaint on those claims; f urther ORDERED that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/29/2022. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, ) (Main Document 59 replaced on 7/29/2022 to correct the signature date to reflect July) (wcl, ). Modified on 7/29/2022 (wcl, ).
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION
ROBERT S. LLOYD,
LT WAYLON COUSINS and
WARDEN ANTONIO McCLAIN,
CIVIL ACTION NO.
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court
(1) Plaintiff’s objections (Doc. 55 & Doc. 57) are
(2) The motion for oral argument (Doc. 56) is denied.
recommendation (Doc. 54) is adopted.
(4) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc.
33) is granted.
(5) Judgment is entered in favor of defendants and
against plaintiff, with plaintiff taking nothing by his
complaint on those claims.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 29th day of July, 2022.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?