Coggins v. Tallapoosa County Department of Revenue (MAG+)

Filing 14

JUDGMENT re 13 Memorandum Opinion, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plf's 12 Objections are overruled; (2) Plf's 12 Motion to Dismiss is denied; (3) The US Magistrate Judge's 11 Recommendation is adopted; (4) Plf's 7 Motion to Set Aside and Motion for Default, Default Judgment, and Dismissal are denied; (5) This lawsuit is dismissed pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e); further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plf, for which execution may issue; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 6/17/2009. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION GENE COGGINS, Plaintiff, v. TALLAPOOSA COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:08cv944-MHT (WO) In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plaintiff's overruled. (2) Plaintiff's motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 12) is denied. (3) The United States Magistrate Judge's objections (Doc. No. 12) are recommendation (Doc. No. 11) is adopted. (4) Plaintiff's motion to set aside (Doc. No. 7) and motion for default, default judgment, and dismissal (Doc. No. 10) are denied. (5) This lawsuit is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e). It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE, this the 17th day of June, 2009. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?