Lake Martin, Inc. et al v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al

Filing 45

ORDER, upon consideration of the 43 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal it is hereby ORDERED: (1) that all claims against def Sam's East, Inc. are DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs; (2) that plfs' claims as set forth in the complaint remain against all other defs, named or unnamed; (3) def Racetrac's 30 MOTION to Sever is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Hon. Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller on 3/1/10. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR T H E MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA E A S T E R N DIVISION L A K E MARTIN, INC., et al., P la in tif f s , v. K R O G E R LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I, e t al., D e f e n d a n ts. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) C A S E NO. 3:09-cv-985-MEF (W O - Do Not Publish) ORDER U p o n consideration of the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice (Doc. #43) f ile d on February 23, 2010, it is hereby ORDERED: 1 . That all claims against defendant Sam's East, Inc. are DISMISSED with prejudice, e a c h party to bear its own costs. 2 . That plaintiffs' claims as set forth in the complaint remain against all other d e f e n d a n ts , named or unnamed. 3 . That defendant Racetrac's motion to sever (Doc. #30) is DENIED as MOOT. D O N E this the 1st day of March, 2010. /s/ Mark E. Fuller CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?