Farris v. Forniss et al (INMATE 2)
Filing
18
ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 17 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE that: (1.) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED ; (2.) The petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Petitioner Perry Farris is DENIED as petitioner failed to file the petition within the one-year period of limitation set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(I), and this petition is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/1/12. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
PERRY FARRIS, #202577,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Petitioner,
v.
LEON FORNISS, et al.,
Respondents.
CASE NO. 3:10-cv-270-MEF
ORDER
On April 2, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #17) in this
case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file
in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the
ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE that:
1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED.
2. The petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Petitioner Perry Farris is DENIED as
petitioner failed to file the petition within the one-year period of limitation set forth in 28
U.S.C. ยง 2244(d)(I), and this petition is DISMISSED with prejudice.
st
DONE this the 1 day of May, 2012.
/s/ Mark E. Fuller
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?