Farris v. Forniss et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 18

ORDER directing that, upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the 17 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE that: (1.) The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED ; (2.) The petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Petitioner Perry Farris is DENIED as petitioner failed to file the petition within the one-year period of limitation set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(I), and this petition is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 5/1/12. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION PERRY FARRIS, #202577, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. LEON FORNISS, et al., Respondents. CASE NO. 3:10-cv-270-MEF ORDER On April 2, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. #17) in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE that: 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. 2. The petition for habeas corpus relief filed by Petitioner Perry Farris is DENIED as petitioner failed to file the petition within the one-year period of limitation set forth in 28 U.S.C. ยง 2244(d)(I), and this petition is DISMISSED with prejudice. st DONE this the 1 day of May, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?