Davis v. Jones et al (INMATE1)

Filing 14

OPINION AND ORDER; 1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; 2. The plaintiff's claims against Judge Kenneth Wilkes be and are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the direc tives of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); 3. Judge Kenneth Wilkes be and is hereby DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action; and 4. The plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants be and are hereby REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. Signed by Honorable Ira De Ment on 7/29/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(jg, )

Download PDF
D a v i s v. Jones et al (INMATE1) D o c . 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FO R THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTER N DIVISION RO BE RT LOUIS DAVIS, Plaintiff, v. J AY JONES, et al., D e f e n d a n ts . ) ) ) ) ) C IVIL ACTION NO. 3:10cv393-ID ) (WO) ) ) ) OP IN ION and ORDER O n July 8, 2010, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation in this case to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 6). Upon an independent review of the file in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows that: 1. 2. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge be and is hereby ADOPTED; The plaintiff's claims against Judge Kenneth Wilkes be and are hereby DISMISSED w ith prejudice prior to service of process in accordance with the directives of 28 U .S.C . 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (iii); 3. J udge Kenneth Wilkes be and is hereby DISMISSED as a defendant in this cause of action; and 4. The plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants be and are hereby R EFER R ED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for appropriate proceedings. D one this 29th day of July, 2010. /s/ Ira DeMent SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?