Belton v. Russell County Board of Education et al

Filing 124

JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plf Marilyn Belton's 117 & 121 Objections are overruled; (2) Dft Lalanya Almesha Ramsey's 118 Objections are overruled; (3) The Magistrate Judge's [115 ] & 119 Recommendations are adopted; (4) Plf Belton's 106 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; (5) Dft Ramsey's 101 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; (6) Dfts Russell County Board of Education, Lillian Baker, and Marcia Johnson 's 101 , 102 , & 104 Motions for Summary Judgment are granted; (7) Judgment is entered favor of dfts Russell County Board of Education, Baker, and Johnson and against plf Belton on plf Belton's remaining retaliation claims, with plf Bel ton taking nothing by her complaint as to these dfts on her remaining retaliation claims; further ORDERED that dfts Russell County Board of Education, Baker, and Johnson are terminated as parties; further ORDERED that this case is referred back to th e magistrate judge as to plf Belton's remaining retaliation claims against dft Ramsey; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/26/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(wcl, )

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

MARILYN BELTON,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
RUSSELL COUNTY BOARD OF
EDUCATION, et al.,
Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:10cv814-MHT
(WO)

JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Plaintiff Marilyn Belton’s objections (doc. nos.
117 and 121) are overruled.
(2) Defendant Lalanya Almesha Ramsey’s objections
(doc. no. 118) are overruled.
(3) The magistrate judge’s recommendations (doc. nos.
115 and 119) are adopted.

(4) Plaintiff Belton’s motion for summary judgment
(doc. no. 106) is denied.
(5) Defendant Ramsey’s motion for summary judgment
(doc. no. 101) is denied.
(6) Defendants Russell County Board of Education,
Lillian Baker, and Marcia Johnson’s motions for summary
judgment (doc. nos. 101, 102, and 104) are granted.
(7) Judgment is entered favor of defendants Russell
County Board of Education, Baker, and Johnson and against
plaintiff

Belton

on

plaintiff

Belton’s

remaining

retaliation claims, with plaintiff Belton taking nothing
by her complaint as to these defendants on her remaining
retaliation claims.
It is further ORDERED that defendants Russell County
Board of Education, Baker, and Johnson are terminated as
parties.
It is further ORDERED that this case is referred back
to

the

magistrate

judge

as

to

plaintiff

Belton’s

remaining retaliation claims against defendant Ramsey.

2

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is not closed.
DONE, this the 26th day of September, 2012.

/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE