Kidd v. Mando American Corporation

Filing 60

FINAL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Defendant Mando American Corporation and against the Plaintiff Leanne Renee Kidd on her federal claims. The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c),over the state law claims of negligent or wanton hiring, training, supervision, and retention and intentional infliction of emotional distress, and those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Costs are taxed to the Plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Judge W. Ha rold Albritton, III on 4/10/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (Deadlines terminated: Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/26/2012 and Jury Trial set for 5/21/2012.) (dmn, ) [Modified on 4/10/2012 to include deadlines terminated text.-dmn]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION

LEANNE RENEE KIDD,
Plaintiff,
v.
MANDO AMERICA CORPORATION,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:10-cv-871-WHA
(WO)

FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the Memorandum Opinion and Order entered in this case on this day,

Final Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendant Mando America Corporation and
against the Plaintiff Leanne Renee Kidd on her federal claims.
The court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c),
over the state law claims of negligent or wanton hiring, training, supervision, and retention and
intentional infliction of emotional distress, and those claims are DISMISSED without prejudice.
Costs are taxed to the Plaintiff.

Done this 10th day of April, 2012.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton
W. HAROLD ALBRITTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE