Canal Indemnity Company v. Regency Club Condominium Owners Association, Inc. et al

Filing 127

ORDER directing that, consistent with the 123 Memorandum Opinion and Order issued on January 7, 2013, judgment is ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff Canal Indemnity Company ("Canal"), and against Defendant Park Lane Construction, Inc. ("P ark Lane"), on Canal's 8 First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Park Lane's 43 Counterclaim; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against Park Lane Construction, Inc. for which execution may issue; the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment under Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 1/14/13. (Furnished to WR) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION CANAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. REGENCY CLUB OWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3:11-cv-400-MEF (WO – Do Not Publish) ORDER Consistent with the Memorandum Opinion and Order issued on January 7, 2013, judgment is ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff Canal Indemnity Company (“Canal”), and against Defendant Park Lane Construction, Inc. (“Park Lane”), on Canal’s First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment (Doc. #8) and Park Lane’s Counterclaim (Doc. #43). It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against Park Lane Construction, Inc. for which execution may issue. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment under Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. DONE this the 14th day of January, 2013. /s/ Mark E. Fuller UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?