Bailey-Potts v. Alabama Department of Public Safety

Filing 35

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) def Alabama Dept of Public Safety's 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment is granted; (2) judgment is entered in favor of def and against plf, with plf taking nothing by her complaint; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against plaintiff, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 2/21/12. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, ). Furnished to calendar group & AG (terminates PTC 2/17/2012 and Jury Selection and Trial 7/9/2012).

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION SHERRY ANNE BAILEY-POTTS, Plaintiff, v. ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11cv495-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Defendant Alabama Department of Public Safety’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 15) is granted. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Alabama Department of Public Safety and against plaintiff Sherry Anne Bailey-Potts, with plaintiff Bailey-Potts taking nothing by her complaint. It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Bailey-Potts, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 21st day of February, 2012. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?