Mills v. City of Phenix City, Alabama
Filing
38
FINAL JUDGMENT directing as follows: (1) Defendant City of Phenix City, Alabama's 12 motion for summary judgment is granted; (2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant City of Phenix City, Alabama and against plaintiff Beverly Mills, with p laintiff Mills taking nothing by her complaint; further ORDERED that costs are taxed against plaintiff Mills, for which execution may issue; the clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the FRCP. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/16/12. (Furnished to Calendar/AG)(Term'd: Jury Trial 07/23/2012) (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(scn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
BEVERLY MILLS,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF PHENIX CITY,
ALABAMA,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:11cv529-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) Defendant City of Phenix City, Alabama’s motion
for summary judgment (Doc. No. 12) is granted.
(2) Judgment is entered in favor of defendant City of
Phenix City, Alabama and against plaintiff Beverly Mills,
with plaintiff Mills taking nothing by her complaint.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
plaintiff Mills, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 16th day of July, 2012.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?