Moses v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Filing
24
JUDGMENT, in accordance with the memorandum opinion entered this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) the petitioner's 11 & 22 objections are overruled; (2) the 10 & 21 report and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge are adopted; (3) the 28 USC 2255 petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied; further ORDERING that costs are taxed against petitioner, for which execution may issue; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 9/2/14. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
TONY TERRELL MOSES, SR.,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:11cv625-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. Nos. 11 & 22)
are overruled.
(2) The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge's
recommendations (Doc. Nos. 10 & 21) are adopted.
(3) The 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 petition for writ of habeas
corpus (Doc. No. 1) is denied.
It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against
petitioner, for which execution may issue.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 2nd day of September, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?