Todd v. Daewon America, Inc.
Filing
118
JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Dft Daewon America, Inc.'s 101 motion to dismiss is granted as to the following 14 opt-in plfs: Matthew Bolt, James Brooks, Willie Davis, Jeffery Heard, Charlie Herro n, Kathleen Hursh, Euseiok Jeong, Daniel Kim, Ji Kun Kim, Edwin Reece, David Sargent, Icjock Taylor, Barbara Wise, and James Yielding; (2) These 14 opt-in plfs are dismissed with prejudice and terminated from this litigation; (3) The motion is still pending as to other opt-in plfs; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/18/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
KELVIN TODD,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
DAEWON AMERICA, INC.,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:11cv1077-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the opinion entered this date, it
is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as
follows:
(1) Defendant
dismiss (doc. no.
opt-in plaintiffs:
Daewon
America,
Inc.’s
motion
to
101) is granted as to the following 14
Matthew Bolt, James Brooks, Willie
Davis, Jeffery Heard, Charlie Herron, Kathleen Hursh,
Euseiok Jeong, Daniel Kim, Ji Kun Kim, Edwin Reece, David
Sargent, Icjock Taylor, Barbara Wise, and James Yielding.
(2) These 14 opt-in plaintiffs are dismissed with
prejudice and terminated from this litigation.
(3) The motion is still pending as to other opt-in
plaintiffs.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant
to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
This case is not closed.
DONE, this the 18th day of April, 2014.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?