Todd v. Daewon America, Inc.
Filing
141
JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The 135 motion to approve settlement agreement is granted; (2) The corrected joint settlement agreement filed by the parties (doc. no. 131 -1) is approved with the modifi cation specified in the memorandum opinion entered today--that is, that the confidentiality provision is void; (3) This lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs; All other pending motions are denie d as moot; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/24/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
KELVIN TODD,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
DAEWON AMERICA, INC.,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:11cv1077-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered
today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the
court as follows:
(1)
The
motion
to
approve
settlement
agreement
(doc. no. 135) is granted.
(2) The corrected joint settlement agreement filed
by the parties (doc. no. 131-1) is approved with the
modification
entered
specified
today--that
is,
in
the
that
memorandum
the
opinion
confidentiality
provision is void.
(3) This lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with
prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs.
All other pending motions are denied as moot.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Procedure.
This case is closed.
DONE, this the 24th day of March, 2016.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Civil
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?