Todd v. Daewon America, Inc.

Filing 141

JUDGMENT: it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The 135 motion to approve settlement agreement is granted; (2) The corrected joint settlement agreement filed by the parties (doc. no. 131 -1) is approved with the modifi cation specified in the memorandum opinion entered today--that is, that the confidentiality provision is void; (3) This lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs; All other pending motions are denie d as moot; DIRECTING the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; This case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/24/2016. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION KELVIN TODD, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. DAEWON AMERICA, INC., Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:11cv1077-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) The motion to approve settlement agreement (doc. no. 135) is granted. (2) The corrected joint settlement agreement filed by the parties (doc. no. 131-1) is approved with the modification entered specified today--that is, in the that memorandum the opinion confidentiality provision is void. (3) This lawsuit is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice, with the parties to bear their own costs. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil pursuant to Rule 58 of docket the as a Federal final Rules judgment of Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 24th day of March, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Civil

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?