McCurdy v. Auburn University et al

Filing 44

JUDGMENT: Because, pursuant to the 35 Brief filed by plaintiff Dorothy McCurdy in response to the pending motion to dismiss, there are no claims remaining against defendant Tommy Waldrop, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that defe ndant Tommy Waldrop is dismissed and terminated as a party. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. This case is not closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/30/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION DOROTHY McCURDY, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. AUBURN UNIVERSITY, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:14cv226-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT Because, pursuant to the brief (doc. no. 35) filed by plaintiff Dorothy McCurdy in response to the pending motion to dismiss, there are no claims remaining against defendant Tommy Waldrop, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court that defendant Tommy Waldrop is dismissed and terminated as a party. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is not closed. DONE, this the 30th day of April, 2015. /s/ Myron H. Thompson___ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?