Patel et al v. Amonett
Filing
32
JUDGMENT, in accordance with the opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Plf Vinodkumar Patel, on behalf of minor child S.V.P., shall have and recover the aggregate sum of $ 23,500.00 from defen dant James O. Amonett; Payment shall be made to the Trust Account of Emmanuel, Sheppard & Condon, with said proceeds to be distributed, as further set out in order; In the event that counsel for S.V.P. is able to negotiate any subrogation claim to an amount lower than listed above, the additional saved amounts shall be distributed to plf Vinodkumar Patel for the use and benefit of S.V.P.; (2) def Amonett shall pay the guardian ad litem fee of $1,430.00 directly to Hon. Karen Laneaux; (3) Up on payment of the foregoing, def Amonett shall be fully released from any further claims by or on behalf of S.V.P. arising out of the August 2013 accident; further ORDERING that the remaining plfs motion, orally made on 3/1/17, to dismiss all claims in these matters is granted, and, except as to judgment entered above for $ 23,500.00, these actions are dismissed with prejudice; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; these cases are closed.. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 3/3/17. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
RAMESHBHAI PATEL, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JAMES O. AMONETT,
Defendant.
VINODKUMAR PATEL,
individually and on behalf
of minor child S.V.P., and
JYOTSNA PATEL,
Plaintiffs,
v.
JAMES O. AMONETT,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:15cv829-MHT
(WO)
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:15cv830-MHT
(WO)
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the opinion entered today, it is
the
ORDER,
JUDGMENT,
and
DECREE
of
the
court
as
follows:
(1) Plaintiff Vinodkumar Patel, on behalf of minor
child S.V.P., shall have and recover the aggregate sum
of
$ 23,500.00
from
defendant
James
O.
Amonett.
Payment shall be made to the Trust Account of Emmanuel,
Sheppard & Condon, with said proceeds to be distributed
as follows:
(a) The sum of $ 7,000.00 to Allstate Insurance
Company for payments made on behalf of S.V.P.
(b) The sum of $ 4,108.50 to Baptist Medical
Center
for
outstanding
charges
for
the
medical
treatment of S.V.P.
(c)
The
sum
of
$ 1,098.90
to
plaintiff
Vinodkumar Patel, S.V.P.’s father, for reimbursement of
his
payment
of
the
charges
of
Care
Ambulance
for
transport of S.V.P. on the date of the accident.
(d) $ 6,800.00 to Emmanuel, Sheppard & Condon,
for attorneys’ fees.
(e) $ 4,492.60 to plaintiff Vinodkumar Patel
for the use and benefit of S.V.P.
In the event that counsel for S.V.P. is able to
negotiate any subrogation claim to an amount lower than
listed
above,
the
additional
2
saved
amounts
shall
be
distributed to plaintiff Vinodkumar Patel for the use
and benefit of S.V.P.
(2) Defendant Amonett shall pay the guardian ad
litem fee of $ 1,430.00 directly to Hon. Karen Laneaux.
(3)
Upon
payment
of
the
foregoing,
defendant
Amonett shall be fully released from any further claims
by or on behalf of S.V.P. arising out of the August
2013 accident.
Furthermore,
as
counsel
for
all
the
remaining
plaintiffs represented that all their claims in these
cases
have
been
settled,
it
is
ORDERED
that
the
remaining plaintiffs’ motion, orally made on March 1,
2017,
to
dismiss
all
claims
in
these
matters
is
granted, and, except as to judgment entered above for
$ 23,500.00,
these
actions
are
dismissed
with
prejudice.
The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this
document
on
the
civil
pursuant
to
Rule
58
of
docket
the
Procedure.
3
as
a
Federal
final
Rules
judgment
of
Civil
These cases are closed.
DONE, this the 3rd day of March, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?