Harris v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 5

JUDGMENT, in accordance with the opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Petitioner Tiombe Harriss 2 petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted; (2) The sentence (doc. nos. 72, 73, and 74) entere d in United States v. Harris, 3:09-cr-112-MHT (M.D. Ala. Jan. 15, 2016), is vacated; (3) The clerk of court is to file this judgment, along with the companion opinion, in United States v. Harris, 3:09-cr-112-MHT (M.D. Ala.); further ORDERING that no costs are taxed; directing the clerk to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 FRCP; this case is closed. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/12/16. (Attachments: # 1 civil appeals checklist)(djy, )

Download PDF
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION TIOMBE HARRIS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16cv333-MHT (WO) JUDGMENT In accordance with the opinion entered today, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the court as follows: (1) Petitioner Tiombe Harris’s petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. no. 2) is granted. (2) The sentence (doc. nos. 72, 73, and 74) entered in United States v. Harris, 3:09-cr-112-MHT (M.D. Ala. Jan. 15, 2016), is vacated. (3) The clerk of court is to file this judgment, along with the companion opinion, in United States v. Harris, 3:09-cr-112-MHT (M.D. Ala.). It is further ORDERED that no costs are taxed. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This case is closed. DONE, this the 12th day of May, 2016. /s/ Myron H. Thompson UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?