Stewart v. Argos Ready Mix, LLC et al
Filing
53
OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that: (1) Defendant Ronnee J. Pedersens objections (doc. no. 49 ) are overruled. (2) The United States Magistrate Judges recommendation (doc. no. 48 ) is adopted. (3) Defendant Pedersons motion to dismiss or, altern atively, for judgment on the pleadings (doc. no. 42 ) is denied. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 4/17/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION
CHARLES W. STEWART,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
v.
ARGOS READY MIX, LLC,
et al.,
Defendants.
CIVIL ACTION NO.
3:16cv356-MHT
(WO)
OPINION AND ORDER
Plaintiff
asserting
Charles
federal
W.
Stewart
claims
under
filed
the
this
lawsuit
Americans
with
Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., and the
Family Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq., as
well as claims under state law.
This lawsuit is now
before the court on the recommendation of the United
States
Magistrate
Pedersen’s
motion
Judge
to
that
dismiss
defendant
or,
alternatively,
judgment on the pleadings be denied.
court
are
defendant
recommendation.
Pedersen’s
After
an
Ronnee
J.
for
Also before the
objections
independent
and
to
de
the
novo
review
of
Pedersen’s
the
record,
objections
the
should
court
be
concludes
overruled
and
that
the
magistrate judge’s recommendation adopted.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:
(1) Defendant Ronnee J. Pedersen’s objections
(doc. no. 49) are overruled.
(2)
The
United
States
Magistrate
Judge’s
recommendation (doc. no. 48) is adopted.
(3) Defendant Pederson’s motion to dismiss or,
alternatively, for judgment on the pleadings (doc.
no. 42) is denied.
This case is referred back to the magistrate
judge for further proceedings.
DONE, this the 17th day of April, 2017.
/s/ Myron H. Thompson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?