Brown v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Filing 13

ORDER that the 12 Recommendation is ADOPTED. It is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff Cedrick Brown's 1 2255 Motion is CHARACTERIZED as a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241. 2. This action is TRANSFERRED to the United Stat es District Court for the Southern District of Indiana pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1631. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the necessary steps to effectuate the terms of this order. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 3/30/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION CEDRICK BROWN, No. 10750002, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:16-CV-766-WKW [WO] ORDER On January 17, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 12.) Upon an independent review of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation is ADOPTED. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows: 1. Plaintiff Cedrick Brown’s “2255 motion” (Doc. # 1) is CHARACTERIZED as a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 2. This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to take the necessary steps to effectuate the terms of this order. DONE this 30th day of March, 2017. /s/ W. Keith Watkins CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE   2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?