Moss v. Randolph County Jail et al (INMATE 2)

Filing 7

ORDER: it is ORDERED as follows: 1) The 5 Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2) Plf's claims against the Randolph County Jail are DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 USC 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); 3) The Randolph County Jail is dismissed as a dft; DIREC TING the Clerk to modify the docket sheet to reflect that the Randolph County Jail is no longer a dft in this case; This case REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/28/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Appeals Checklist) (wcl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
EASTERN DIVISION
TIMOTHY L. MOSS,
Plaintiff,
v.
RANDOLPH COUNTY JAIL, et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
) CASE NO. 3:17-CV-557-WKW
) (WO)
)
)
)

ORDER
On September 5, 2017, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation to
which no timely objections have been filed. (Doc. # 5.) Upon an independent review
of the record and upon consideration of the Recommendation, it is ORDERED as
follows:
1.

The Recommendation (Doc. # 5) is ADOPTED.

2.

Plaintiff’s claims against the Randolph County Jail are DISMISSED with

prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).
3.

The Randolph County Jail is dismissed as a defendant. The Clerk of the Court

is DIRECTED to modify the docket sheet to reflect that the Randolph County Jail is
no longer a defendant in this case.
This case REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.
DONE this 28th day of September, 2017.
/s/ W. Keith Watkins
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE