Williams v. Pfizer Inc
JUDGMENT ADOPTING 20 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss 6 filed by Pfizer Inc is GRANTED IN PART, and that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Pfizer, Inc DISMISS ING WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiff's punitive damages claims not arising under the Louisiana Products Liability Act or in redhibition. Pfizer's 6 Motion to Dismiss and Alternative Motion to Stay is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert G James on 5/14/09. (crt,DickersonSld, D) [Transferred from Louisiana Western on 10/19/2009.]
IN MOP~1POE, LA
TONY R. MOORE, CLERK WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUIE..'
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
DANIEL WILLIAMS VERSUS PFIZER, INC.
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-1222 JUDGE JAMES MAGISTRATE JUDGE HAYES
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) [Doc. # 6] filed by Defendant Pfizer, Inc. is GRANTED IN PART, and that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Pfizer, Inc. DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE Plaintiffs punitive damages claims and all other claims not arising under the Louisiana Products Liability Act or in redhibition. Pfizer's Motion to Dismiss and Alternative Motion to Stay [Doc. # 6] is otherwise DENIED. MONROE, LOUISIANA, this
ROBERT G. JAMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?