Wilson v. The Birmingham Public Library Foundation et al
Evidentiary Material re: 37 Response in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Affidavit of Barbara Wilson, # 2 Exhibit Wilson EEOC Charge, # 3 Exhibit Ex. 28 to Blaylock Depo., # 4 Exhibit Ex. 11 to Blaylock Depo., # 5 Exhibit Depo. of Angela Hall, # 6 Exhibit Depo. of Barbara Clotfelter, # 7 Exhibit Depo. of Sandra Lee, # 8 Exhibit Depo. of Mike Lee, # 9 Exhibit Depo. of Edith Major, # 10 Exhibit Depo. of Dave Ryan, # 11 Exhibit Depo. of Barry Lollar)(Morel, Adam)
2011 Aug-17 PM 09:23
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
BARBARA ANN WILSON,
THE CITY OF BIRMINGHAM;
PLAINTIFF’S EVIDENTIARY SUBMISSION IN SUPPORT OF HER
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The Plaintiff, through undersigned counsel, submits the following evidence in
support of her Response to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
Ex. 1 - Wilson Affidavit.
Ex 2 - Wilson EEOC Charge.
Ex. 3 - Ex. 28 to Deposition of Irene Blaylock.
Ex. 4 - Ex. 11 to Deposition of Irene Blaylock
Ex. 5 - Deposition of Angela Hall
Ex. 6 - Deposition of Barbara Clotfelter
Ex. 7 - Deposition of Sandra Lee
Ex. 8 - Deposition of Mike Lee
Ex. 9 - Deposition of Edith Major
Ex. 10 - Deposition of Dave Ryan
Ex 11 - Deposition of Barry Lollar
*The Defendants have previously filed the Depositions of Barbara Wilson and
Irene Blaylock. To preserve economy, the Plaintiff will not duplicate those
s/Adam P. Morel
Adam P. Morel
ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF
LAW OFFICES OF ADAM MOREL, P.C.
517 Beacon Parkway West
Birmingham, AL 35209
Telephone: (205) 252-8841
Facsimile: (205) 252-3727
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on August 17, 2011, I electronically filed the foregoing
with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification
of such filing to all attorneys of record.
s/Adam P. Morel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?