Navarre v. Wyndham Hotels and Resorts, LLC. et al
Filing
57
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: motion for contempt of court against non-party, Winngate Inn. Signed by Judge William M Acker, Jr on 5/16/13. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(SAC )
FILED
2013 May-16 PM 04:04
U.S. DISTRICT COURT
N.D. OF ALABAMA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
SOUTHERN DIVISION
LINDA FAYE NAVARRE,
Plaintiff,
v.
SYSCO CENTRAL ALABAMA, INC.,
et al.,
Defendants.
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
CIVIL ACTION NO.
11-AR-3056-S
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
On April 15, 2013, plaintiff, Linda Faye Navarre, filed a
motion for contempt of court against non-party, Winngate Inn.
A
copy of the said motion is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”.
On April 16, 2013, in response to the said motion, this court
entered an order of contempt fining Winngate Inn the sum of $500
per day.
A copy of the court’s said order is attached as Exhibit
“B”.
As directed by the court, the Clerk mailed a copy of the order
of April 16, 2013, to Winngate Inn, 800 Corporate Ridge Drive,
Birmingham, Alabama 35242, by certified mail.
On April 24, 2013,
said certified mail was returned by the United States Postal
Service, marked “return to sender, not deliverable as addressed,
unable to forward”.
The court has made counsel for plaintiff aware of the nondeliverance of the order of April 16, 2013, but plaintiff has made
no effort of which the court is aware to confirm an address for
service on Winngate Inn. If and when plaintiff furnishes a correct
address for Winngate Inn, or an agent of Winngate Inn who has
authority to respond to plaintiff’s subpoena duces tecum, and to
the subsequent orders of the court, the court will order the U.S.
Marshal to serve appropriate papers upon Winngate Inn to accomplish
plaintiff’s purpose.
DONE this 16th day of May, 2013.
_____________________________
WILLIAM M. ACKER, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?