Cotton Bayou Marina, Inc. v. BP, PLC et al
MOTION for Richard C. Godfrey to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 50, Receipt number 1128-943219, Online Credit Card Payment.) by BP America, Inc., BP Products North America, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B) (Brooks, William)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION COTTON BAYOU MARINA, INC.; et al., Plaintiffs, v. BP, PLC; et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 1:10-cv-243-C ) ) ) )
MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5, William H. Brooks moves the Court to enter an order admitting Richard C. Godfrey pro hac vice in this action as counsel for defendants BP America Inc. and BP Products North America Inc. Mr. Godfrey's Application and a Certificate of Good Standing from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, where Mr. Godfrey regularly practices, are attached hereto as Exhibits A and B. The fee of $50.00 is submitted herewith. s/ William H. Brooks John M. Johnson (JOHNJ7318) Adam K. Peck (PECKA0851) William H. Brooks (BROOW3330) Marchello D. Gray (GRAYM6384) Attorneys for Defendants BP Products North America Inc. and BP America Inc.
OF COUNSEL: LIGHTFOOT, FRANKLIN & WHITE, L.L.C. 400 North 20th Street Birmingham, Alabama 35203 Tel: (205) 581-0700 Fax: (205) 581-0799 JJohnson@lightfootlaw.com APeck@lightfootlaw.com Wbrooks@lightfootlaw.com MGray@lightfootlaw.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 16th day of June, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: Jere L. Beasley, Esq. Rhon E. Jones, Esq. David B. Byrne, III, Esq. John E. Tomlinson, Esq. Christopher D. Boutwell, Esq. Joseph P. Miller, Esq. BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW, METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C. P.O. Box 4160 Montgomery, AL 36103-4160
/s/ William H. Brooks Of Counsel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?