Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al

Filing 36

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COUNTERCLAIMANTS TO RESPOND TO COUNTERDEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS by QED Media Group, L.L.C., Robert Russo(an individual), Internet Defamation League. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dana, Michael)

Download PDF
Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al Doc. 36 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 (602) 382-6000 Michael K. Dana (State Bar No. 019047) Teresa K. Anderson (State Bar No. 024919) SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. One Arizona Center 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202 Telephone: (602) 382-6000 Attorneys for and Robert Russo, QED Media Group, L.L.C., and Internet Defamation League, LLC IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC, an Arizona corporation, d/b/a "RIPOFFREPORT.COM"; ED MAGEDSON, an individual, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY, an individual; WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY d/b/a DEFAMATION ACTION.COM; WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY d/b/a COMPLAINTREMOVER.COM; WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY aka JIM RICKSON; WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY aka MATT JOHNSON; ROBERT RUSSO, an individual; ROBERT RUSSO d/b/a COMPLAINTREMOVER.COM; ROBERT RUSSO d/b/a DEFENDMYNAME.COM; ROBERT RUSSO d/b/a QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C.; QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C.; QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C. d/b/a DEFENDMYNAME.COM; QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C. d/b/a COMPLAINTREMOVER.COM; DEFAMATION ACTION LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; and INTERNET DEFAMATION LEAGUE, an unincorporated association, Defendants. Case No. CV07-00954 PHX NVW STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR COUNTERCLAIMANTS TO RESPOND TO COUNTERDEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. 2016558.1 Case 2:07-cv-00954-NVW Document 36 Filed 06/29/2007 Page 1 of 3 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 (602) 382-6000 ROBERT RUSSO, an individual; and QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C., Counterclaimants, v. XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC, an Arizona corporation, d/b/a "RIPOFFREPORT.COM"; ED MAGEDSON, an individual, Counterdefendants. Counterclaimants and Counterdefendants stipulate that the deadline for Counterclaimants to respond to Counterdefendants' June 15, 2007 Motion to Dismiss presently set for July 2, 2007 may be extended to July 6, 2007. Additional time is necessary to accommodate next week's holiday schedule and the heavy workload of undersigned counsel. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Count enter the proposed form of Order submitted herewith reflecting this stipulation. DATED this 29th day of June, 2007. SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. /s/ Michael K. Dana Michael K. Dana Teresa K. Anderson One Arizona Center 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202 Attorneys for Robert Russo, QED Media Group, L.L.C. and Internet Defamation League, LLC JABURG & WILK By /s/ Maria Crimi Speth Maria Crimi Speth 3200 North Central Avenue Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Attorneys for Plaintiffs By 2016558.1 Case 2:07-cv-00954-NVW Document 36- 2 -Filed 06/29/2007 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 (602) 382-6000 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Maria Crimi Speth Jaburg & Wilk 3200 North Central Avenue Suite 2000 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Attorneys for Plaintiffs mcs@jaburgwilk.com I further certify that on June 29, 2007, I served a courtesy copy of the aforementioned document and transmittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing by mail on the following: The Honorable Neil V. Wake United States District Court 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85003 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2016558.1 Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. /s/ E. E. Szafranski Case 2:07-cv-00954-NVW Document 36- 3 -Filed 06/29/2007 Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?