Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al

Filing 58

STIPULATION RE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND SCOPE OF AUGUST 22, 2007 HEARING by Robert Russo, QED Media Group, L.L.C., Defamation Action League. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dana, Michael)

Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al

Doc. 58 Att. 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 [phone]

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC, an Arizona corporation, d/b/a "RIPOFFREPORT.COM"; ED MAGEDSON, an individual, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY, an individual; WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY d/b/a DEFAMATION ACTION.COM; WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY d/b/a COMPLAINTREMOVER.COM; WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY aka JIM RICKSON; WILLIAM "BILL" STANLEY aka MATT JOHNSON; ROBERT RUSSO, an individual; ROBERT RUSSO d/b/a COMPLAINTREMOVER.COM; ROBERT RUSSO d/b/a DEFENDMYNAME.COM; ROBERT RUSSO d/b/a QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C.; QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C.; QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C. d/b/a DEFENDMYNAME.COM; QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C. d/b/a COMPLAINTREMOVER.COM; DEFAMATION ACTION LEAGUE, an unincorporated association; and INTERNET DEFAMATION LEAGUE, an unincorporated association, Defendants. Case No. CV07-00954 PHX NVW PROPOSED ORDER

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

2034716.1

Case 2:07-cv-00954-NVW

Document 58-2

Filed 08/14/2007

Page 1 of 2
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, Arizona 85004-2202 [phone]

ROBERT RUSSO, an individual; and QED MEDIA GROUP, L.L.C., Counterclaimants, v. XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC, an Arizona corporation, d/b/a "RIPOFFREPORT.COM"; ED MAGEDSON, an individual, Counterdefendants.

Having considered the parties' Stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' July 27, 2007 Motion for a Protective Order will not be heard at the August 22, 2007 hearing and that the QED Parties need not file a response to that motion. If the parties are unable to finalize the details of their stipulated protective order, the Plaintiffs' may renew their pending Motion. At the August 22, 2007 hearing, the parties will submit for approval a stipulated protective order regarding the depositions of parties in this matter and will address the scope of the existing protective order governing the recent deposition of John Brewington.

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Snell & Wilmer L.L.P.

2034716.1

Case 2:07-cv-00954-NVW

Document 58-2 2 - Filed 08/14/2007

Page 2 of 2