National Federation of the Blind, et al v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al
Filing
32
STIPULATION re 27 Response in Opposition to Motion, 28 Response to Motion, Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for Filing Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Reply in Support of Motion for Expedited Discovery by National Federation of the Blind, American Council of the Blind, Darrell Shandrow. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Friedman, Andrew)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
11
12
13
14
The NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE
BLIND, The AMERICAN COUNCIL OF
THE BLIND, and DARRELL SHANDROW,
15
16
Plaintiffs,
vs.
17
18
19
The ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS and
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY,
Defendants
Case No: 2:09-cv-01359-GMS
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
TIME FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION FOR EXPEDITED
DISCOVERY
(Honorable G. Murray Snow)
20
21
22
23
24
Good cause appearing therefore, and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Plaintiffs to file their Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’
Motion for Preliminary and Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Expedited Discovery is
25
26
27
28
extended to August 7, 2009.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?