National Federation of the Blind, et al v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION re 27 Response in Opposition to Motion, 28 Response to Motion, Joint Stipulation to Extend Time for Filing Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Reply in Support of Motion for Expedited Discovery by National Federation of the Blind, American Council of the Blind, Darrell Shandrow. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Friedman, Andrew)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 11 12 13 14 The NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND, The AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND, and DARRELL SHANDROW, 15 16 Plaintiffs, vs. 17 18 19 The ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS and ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendants Case No: 2:09-cv-01359-GMS [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING PLAINTIFFS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY (Honorable G. Murray Snow) 20 21 22 23 24 Good cause appearing therefore, and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for Plaintiffs to file their Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary and Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Expedited Discovery is 25 26 27 28 extended to August 7, 2009.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?