United States of America v. Arizona, State of, et al
Filing
99
STIPULATION and Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Motion to Dismiss by United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Chilakamarri, Varu)
United States of America v. Arizona, State of, et al
Doc. 99
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Tony West Assistant Attorney General Dennis K. Burke United States Attorney Arthur R. Goldberg Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch Varu Chilakamarri (NY Bar #4324299) Joshua Wilkenfeld (NY Bar #4440681) U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division 20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20530 Tel. (202) 616-8489/Fax (202) 616-8470 varudhini.chilakamarri@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the United States John J. Bouma (#001358) Robert A. Henry (#015104) Joseph G. Adams (#018210) SNELL & WILMER L.L.P. One Arizona Center 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202 Phone: (602) 382-6000 Fax: (602) 382-6070 jbouma@swlaw.com bhenry@swlaw.com jgadams@swlaw.com Joseph A. Kanefield (#015838) Office of Governor Janice K. Brewer 1700 W. Washington, 9th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85007 Phone: (602) 542-1586 Fax: (602) 542-7602 jkanefield@az.gov UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA The United States of America, Plaintiff, v. The State of Arizona; and Janice K. Brewer, Governor of the State of Arizona, in her Official Capacity, No. 2:10-cv-1413-PHX-SRB STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (FIRST REQUEST)
Defendants.
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 DATED: August 5, 2010 Respectfully Submitted, Tony West Assistant Attorney General Dennis K. Burke United States Attorney Arthur R. Goldberg Assistant Director, Federal Programs Branch /s/ Varu Chilakamarri Varu Chilakamarri (NY Bar #4324299) Joshua Wilkenfeld (NY Bar #4440681) U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division 20 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20530 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to LRCiv. 7.3, by and between the parties hereto, through their undersigned counsel, that Plaintiff shall receive a fourteen (14) day extension of time to August 26, 2010, to file its response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. This is the first stipulation seeking an extension of time. Plaintiff's response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is currently due on August 12, 2010. The parties stipulate to an extension of time for two reasons. First, the parties are currently in discussions regarding scheduling of the various proceedings in light of the Defendants' recently filed appeal of this Court's Order on the United States' Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Ninth Circuit has issued a scheduling order pursuant to which briefing and oral argument will be completed by the week of November 1, 2010. Second, owing to the press of other litigation matters and the schedules of various officials who are consulted on this matter, the United States' counsel requires additional time to have the United States' response completed and reviewed. Should this stipulation be approved, Plaintiff would not oppose a similar extension of time for Defendants' reply brief.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Tel. (202) 616-8489/Fax (202) 616-8470 varudhini.chilakamarri@usdoj.gov Attorneys for the United States /s/ Joseph. G. Adams (with permission) John J. Bouma Robert A. Henry Joseph G. Adams One Arizona Center 400 E. Van Buren Phoenix, AZ 85004-2202 Joseph A. Kanefield Office of Governor Janice K. Brewer 1700 W. Washington, 9th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85007 Attorneys for Janice K. Brewer, Governor of the State of Arizona, and the State of Arizona
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on August 5, 2010, I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk's Office using the CM/ECF System for filing and transmittal of Notice of Electronic Filing to the CM/ECF registrants on record in this matter. /s/ Varu Chilakamarri Varu Chilakamarri
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?