Green et al v. Arpaio et al

Filing 18

ORDER that Plaintiffs' 10 Motion to Amend is DENIED; that Arpaio Defendants' 6 Motion to Dismiss and Board Defendants' 7 Motion to Dismiss are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of the Court is directed to remand the case to state court. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 12/17/10. (Attachments: # 1 Remand Letter)(ESL)

Green et al v. Arpaio et al

Doc. 18 Att. 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK
RICHARD H. WEARE
DISTRICT COURT EXECUTIVE / CLERK OF COURT SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR U. S. COURTHOUSE, SUITE 130 401 WEST WASHINGTON STREET, SPC 1 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85003-2118

RONNIE HONEY Visit our website at www.azd.uscourts.gov
CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR U. S. COURTHOUSE, SUITE 130 401 WEST WASHINGTON STREET, SPC 1 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85003-2118

MICHAEL S. O'BRIEN
CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK EVO A. DECONCINI U.S. COURTHOUSE 405 W. CONGRESS, SUITE 1500 TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-5010

December 17, 2010

Michael Jeanes, Clerk Maricopa County Superior Court 201 West Jefferson Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2205 RE: Remand to Maricopa County Superior Court District Court Case Number: CV10-1481-PHX-GMS Marguerite T.M. Green, et al. v. Joe Arpaio, et al. Superior Court Number: CV2010-051277 Dear Mr. Jeanes: Enclosed is a certified copy of the Order entered in this Court on December 17, 2010, remanding the above case to Maricopa County Superior Court for the State of Arizona. Sincerely, RICHARD H. WEARE District Court Executive/Clerk s/Elaine Leon By: Deputy Clerk Enclosure cc: All Counsel of Record Civil Court Administrator

The staff of the Clerk's Office ensures the effective, efficient and professional delivery of clerical and administrative services, while fostering a customer-friendly and employee-friendly environment.

Dockets.Justia.com