United States of America v. Maricopa, County of et al
STATEMENT of Undisputed Facts re 18 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Peter S. Gray, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19, # 21 Exhibit 20, # 22 Exhibit 21, # 23 Exhibit 22, # 24 Exhibit 23, # 25 Exhibit 24, # 26 Exhibit 25, # 27 Exhibit 26, # 28 Exhibit 27, # 29 Exhibit 28, # 30 Exhibit 29, # 31 Exhibit 30, # 32 Exhibit 31, # 33 Exhibit 32, # 34 Exhibit 33, # 35 Exhibit 34, # 36 Exhibit 35, # 37 Exhibit 36, # 38 Exhibit 37, # 39 Exhibit 38, # 40 Exhibit 39, # 41 Exhibit 40, # 42 Exhibit 41, # 43 Exhibit 42, # 44 Exhibit 43, # 45 Exhibit 44, # 46 Exhibit 45, # 47 Exhibit 46, # 48 Exhibit 47, # 49 Exhibit 48, # 50 Exhibit 49, # 51 Exhibit 50, # 52 Exhibit 51, # 53 Exhibit 52, # 54 Exhibit 53, # 55 Exhibit 54, # 56 Exhibit 55, # 57 Exhibit 56, # 58 Exhibit 57, # 59 Exhibit 58, # 60 Exhibit 59, # 61 Exhibit 60, # 62 Exhibit 61, # 63 Exhibit 62, # 64 Exhibit 63, # 65 Exhibit 64, # 66 Exhibit 65, # 67 Exhibit 66, # 68 Exhibit 67, # 69 Exhibit 68)(Aminfar, Amin)
United States of America v. Maricopa, County of et al
Doc. 19 Att. 36
From: To: Cc: Subject: Date:
McCormick Clarisse Jung, Je Yon (CRT) Weiss, Daniel (CRT); Aminfar, Amin (CRT); Keenan, Elizabeth B (CRT); Chang, Patrick (CRT); Lopez-Ortiz, Luz (CRT) RE: Documents Wednesday, May 06, 2009 12:31:15 PM
Je Yon, Thank you for the helpful information regarding the IPRO software. Based on information obtained to date, MCSO has decided to proceed with the purchase of IPRO and a scanner. If all goes as planned, MCSO will have the software in place and training completed within the next two weeks. Other than the specific documents and information referenced in your email below, MCSO will begin to produce redacted and Bates stamped documents to you directly thereafter. Your patience and understanding are appreciated. Clarisse
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential (attorney-client privileged) and is intended solely for the use of the recipients listed above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distr bution, or copying of the transmitted information is strictly proh bited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete this e-mail.
From: Jung, Je Yon (CRT) [mailto:JeYon.Jung@usdoj.gov] Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 10:11 AM To: McCormick Clarisse Cc: Weiss, Daniel (CRT); Aminfar, Amin (CRT); Keenan, Elizabeth B (CRT); Chang, Patrick (CRT); Lopez -Ortiz, Luz (CRT) Subject: Documents
Good Afternoon ClarisseThank you for the call yesterday. As promised, I am getting back to you regarding your
questions about IPro software. I learned the following from our litigation support colleagues: We do use IPRO software for OCR (Optical Character Recognition), but depending on what I-Pro products you purchase, you can become a full scale copying shop. If you purchase I-Pro...you should be sure that you purchase the proper tools so that the its capable of: Scanning Bates labeling Running OCR Coding data to the images Document determination Redacting AND importantly: Providing load files so that we can load the materials directly into Summation or Concordance Ensuring that it has all of these capabilities may result in added costs to the layered · · · · · · ·
software purchase. In addition to the software, I presume you are considering the purchase of scanners/copiers to perform the document processing. As we discussed, in our experience, outside copying services are more economical and capable of performing all of the functions we need. If you go forward with IPro...our litigation support folks have offered to speak directly with your IT personnel to make sure that the documents/data are input correctly, since the software is only a tool that processes the information, and cannot guarantee that the result will be helpful to either one of us unless it is utilized correctly from the beginning. Aaron Zajic is our contact in litigation support and he is cc'ed here. He welcomes the opportunity to talk to your IT personnel further about the process. His telephone number is 202.616.9965. Again, we renew our offer to split the costs with an outside copying service to perform this task. In the alternative, you indicated that you would confirm whether we could move forward with a copying service in the interim while your software is purchased and implemented. Finally, it is our understanding that you have agreed to provide us with a limited number of documents pending resolution of the full document production: 1. To COR: sample blank visitation form; and sample blank grievance form. You indicated you would clarify whether the visitation form is completed by all individuals visiting an inmate, including lawyers, interpreters, etc., and how the visitation process operates generally (including policies and procedures for each jail). 2. To SPL: sample blank citation form; CAD report capabilities and data captured, including MCSO codes. 3. To COR and SPL: all passwords for access to training materials that can be accessed online, including that provided internally and by outside training organization to review available training material online. Thank you and I hope this information is helpful. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Je Yon Jung Senior Trial Attorney Department of Justice Civil Rights Division Special Litigation Section 601 D Street NW #5916 Washington DC 20004 202.305.1457 tel 202.514.6903 fax