United States of America v. Maricopa, County of et al
Filing
33
EX PARTE MOTION for Substitution of Counsel with Consent by Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Consent to Substitution of Counsel)(Masterson, John)
United States of America v. Maricopa, County of et al
Doc. 33 Att. 1
EXHIBIT
1
Dockets.Justia.com
William R. Jones, Jr., Bar #001481 Jolrn T. Masterson,Bar #007447
2
a
J
Joseph J. Popolizio, Bar #017434 JONES, SKELTON & HOCHULI, P.L.C. 2901 Norlh Central Avenue, Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Telephone: (602) 263-1100 Fax: (602) 200-7801
5
wjones@shfimr.com
j masterson(D,j
j p op
s h fi rm. com olizio @j shfirm. com
6
1
Attorneys for Defendants Maricopa County Sheriff s Office and Joseph M. Arpaio
f\I \ Á\¡v I ! -rur T-!-f¡ Tì q.T' ¿Äi .r- E:. f Ul-l q -!-I-! Tl-.tq 1.\I i,È-lJ i ¡-L*)
'J
f d-ì \,v-L.'¿\!
ç
10
11
lìT D.r
DISTzuCTOF ATIIZONA
United States of America, NO. CV1 O-O 1 878-PHX-GMS
I2
ta l-)
Plaintiff,
V.
CONSEN'I' TO SLIBSTITUTION OF COUNSET,
t4
15
r6
Maricopa County, Arizona Maricopa County Sherifls Office; and Joseph M. Arpaio, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona,
Defendants.
tl
18 19
Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio and the Nlaricopa County Sheriff s Office consent
to the substitution of Williarn R. Jones, Jr., John T. Masterson, Joseirh J. Popolizio anci tire
20
law
21
finl
of Jones, Skelton ancl Hochr,rli, P.L.C., as counsel f-or nanted Defendants
Josepìr
22
23
M. Arpaio and tlie Maricopa Countl, Sheriff's Ollice. in l.i,e above-entitled
of Ogletree, Deakins, Nasl'. Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
c,¿ruse
of
action, in place of Alec R. Hillbo, Kerry Scott Maltin, Leigir Eric Dowell and the law firm
24
25
26 27
28
Dated:
/ o'13
-lo
joscpir
lr,f
. Arpaio
SheniÍ of Mancopa County' in my' official capacity änij on l.reìielf of the \,faricopa Count,v- Sheriff-s Of-ficc
2133858.
I
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?