United States of America v. Maricopa, County of et al

Filing 33

EX PARTE MOTION for Substitution of Counsel with Consent by Joseph M Arpaio, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Consent to Substitution of Counsel)(Masterson, John)

Download PDF
United States of America v. Maricopa, County of et al Doc. 33 Att. 1 EXHIBIT 1 Dockets.Justia.com William R. Jones, Jr., Bar #001481 Jolrn T. Masterson,Bar #007447 2 a J Joseph J. Popolizio, Bar #017434 JONES, SKELTON & HOCHULI, P.L.C. 2901 Norlh Central Avenue, Suite 800 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Telephone: (602) 263-1100 Fax: (602) 200-7801 5 wjones@shfimr.com j masterson(D,j j p op s h fi rm. com olizio @j shfirm. com 6 1 Attorneys for Defendants Maricopa County Sheriff s Office and Joseph M. Arpaio f\I \ \v I ! -rur T-!-f T q.T' i .r- E:. f Ul-l q -!-I-! Tl-.tq 1.\I i,-lJ i -L*) 'J f d- \,v-L.'\! 10 11 lT D.r DISTzuCTOF ATIIZONA United States of America, NO. CV1 O-O 1 878-PHX-GMS I2 ta l-) Plaintiff, V. CONSEN'I' TO SLIBSTITUTION OF COUNSET, t4 15 r6 Maricopa County, Arizona Maricopa County Sherifls Office; and Joseph M. Arpaio, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, Defendants. tl 18 19 Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio and the Nlaricopa County Sheriff s Office consent to the substitution of Williarn R. Jones, Jr., John T. Masterson, Joseirh J. Popolizio anci tire 20 law 21 finl of Jones, Skelton ancl Hochr,rli, P.L.C., as counsel f-or nanted Defendants Josepr 22 23 M. Arpaio and tlie Maricopa Countl, Sheriff's Ollice. in l.i,e above-entitled of Ogletree, Deakins, Nasl'. Smoak & Stewart, P.C. c,ruse of action, in place of Alec R. Hillbo, Kerry Scott Maltin, Leigir Eric Dowell and the law firm 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: / o'13 -lo joscpir lr,f . Arpaio Sheni of Mancopa County' in my' official capacity nij on l.reielf of the \,faricopa Count,v- Sheriff-s Of-ficc 2133858. I

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?