Papillon v. Shymatta

Filing 1

COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $350.00, receipt number PHX 0970-5232013, filed by Michael Papillon (submitted by John Titus). (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK) (Entered: 04/27/2011)

Papillon v. Shymatta - Exhibit A

Papillon v. Shymatta - Exhibit B

Atty Docket No. 40249-1

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
In re Application of

:
:
: Cancellation No. ________________
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

David R. Shymatta
Serial No. 77/126,362
Filing Date: March 9, 2007
Registration No. 3,351,212
Date Registered: December 11, 2007
Mark: CELL JUNKIE
Pending in Class: 035

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
P.O. Box 1451
Alexandria, VA 22313-1451
PETITION TO CANCEL
Sir:
Michael S. Papillon, an individual having an address at 4216 East Desert Marigold
Drive, Cave Creek, Arizona 85331-7888 ("Petitioner") believes that he will be damaged
by the continued registration of the above-captioned mark by David R. Shymatta
("Respondent") and hereby petitions for cancellation of said registration under the
provisions of § 14 of the Trademark Act of July 5, 1946, as amended, (15 U.S.C. § 1051
et seq.).

Papillon v. Shymatta - Exhibit C
1

Petition to Cancel
Mark: CELL JUNKIE
Serial No. 77/126,362
Registration No. 3,351,212
Date Registered: December 11, 2007

Atty Docket No. 40249-1

The grounds for cancellation are as follows:
1.

Petitioner, since at least as early as July 16, 2006 has used the mark THE

CELL PHONE JUNKIE in connection with entertainment services in the nature of an
ongoing internet radio program and blog in the field of comment and criticism of cellular
telephone equipment, cellular providers, and cellular accessories, via his web site
thecellphonejunkie.com.
2.

Petitioner has filed an application for registration of his mark THE CELL

PHONE JUNKIE with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, which is now
pending as Application Serial No. 77946630.
3.

On information and belief, Registrant has abandoned the mark CELL

JUNKIE and/or has abandoned use in interstate commerce. A search of the yellow pages
for Chubbuck ID with the keyword CELL JUNKIE produces only two results, neither of
which is Registrant (see Exhibit A). Similarly, a search of the yellow pages for Inkom ID
with the keyword CELL JUNKIE produces only two results, neither of which is
Registrant (see Exhibit B). A Google search with the keyword CELL JUNKIE does not
produce a link to Registrant (see Exhibit C). Even a Google search with the keyword
CELL JUNKIE IDAHO does not produce a link to Registrant (see Exhibit D).
4.

In addition, based on the application record, Registrant's sole use of the

mark CELL JUNKIE appears to have been for an eBay store. That eBay store has also
been abandoned. (see Exhibit E). Indeed, Registrant's sole use of the mark appears to be

2

Petition to Cancel
Mark: CELL JUNKIE
Serial No. 77/126,362
Registration No. 3,351,212
Date Registered: December 11, 2007

Atty Docket No. 40249-1

for the purpose of extortion as evidenced by the letter received by Petition dated
February 5, 2010. (See Exhibit F).
5.

Petitioner avers that he will be damaged by the continued existence of the

Registration because it may be an impediment to registration of his mark and may
continue to be used as a tool for harassment by Registrant.
WHEREFORE, Petitioner prays for an Order sustaining this Petition and
canceling the registration of the above-captioned mark, and for such other relief as may
be proper.
Respectfully submitted,
DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC

By:

Dated: March 11, 2010

3

/john d. titus/
John D. Titus
Attorneys for Petitioner
Michael S. Papillon
5009 E. Washington, Suite 125
Phoenix, AZ 85034
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Petition to Cancel
Mark: CELL JUNKIE
Serial No. 77/126,362
Registration No. 3,351,212
Date Registered: December 11, 2007

Atty Docket No. 40249-1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true and complete copy of the foregoing PETITION TO
CANCEL has been served on the Applicant, David R. Shymatta, by mailing said copy on
March 11, 2010, by First Class Mail, postage prepaid to the following:
David R. Shymatta
4245 Yellowstone Ave., #A3
Chubbuck, ID 83202

Dated: March 11, 2010

/john d. titus/
John D. Titus
Attorney for Petitioner

DETROIT 40249-1 1150418

4

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT B

cell junkie - Google Search

Page 1 of 2

Google

Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more

Web History | Search settings | Sign in

cell junkie

Search

Web Show options...

Advanced Search

Results 1 - 10 of about 17,300,000 for cell junkie. (0.27 seconds)

The Cell Phone Junkie

The Cell Phone Junkie. ... The Cell Phone Junkie Show #196 1:28:55. Show Notes Final
2009 carrier numbers, Nexus One release info on Verizon and webOS 1.4 ...
Podcasts - April - January - August
thecellphonejunkie.libsyn.com/ - Cached - Similar

The Cell Phone Junkie

This Special Edition of The Cell Phone Junkie is the second round table discussion of the
3rd annual SPE smartphone round robin. ...
thecellphonejunkie.libsyn.com/rss - Cached - Similar
Show more results from thecellphonejunkie.libsyn.com

stores.ebay.com/CELL-JUNKIE
The Cell Phone Junkie - Download free podcast episodes by Mickey ...

Download or subscribe to free podcast episodes from The Cell Phone Junkie by Mickey
Papillon on iTunes.
itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/the-cell-phone-junkie/id171273849 - Cached

TiPb on the Cell Phone Junky Unlocked | TiPb

Feb 5, 2010 ... Frequent iPhone Live! panelist Mickey Papillon was kind enough to invite
yours truly to come on The Cell Phone Junkie Unlocked podcast and ...
www.tipb.com/2010/02/05/tipb-cell-phone-junky-unlocked/ - Cached

The Cell Phone Junkie on PodcastAlley.com -- The place to find ...

The Cell Phone Junkie Show #197 1:20:05Show NotesApple's lawsuit against HTC, Joey
is now running the BESX, and MLB at Bat ushers in the 2010 baseball ...
www.podcastalley.com/podcast_details.php?pod_id=32835 - Cached

Confessions of a cell phone junkie - CNET News

Sure, network quality matters. But consumers are making cool phones a top priority when
deciding on a cellular plan. Photos: Phones that sing A CNET article ...
news.cnet.com/...of...cell...junkie/2100-1039_3-6123668.html - Cached - Similar

App Shopper: The Cell Phone Junkie - Mobile News (Productivity)
iPad, iPhone and iPod touch app store listings, news, and price drops.
appshopper.com/.../the-cell-phone-junkie-mobile-news - Cached - Similar

The Cell Phone Junkie

The Cell Phone Junkie podcast is the most comprehensive podcast out there for all the
News, Devices and Software in the cell phone industry.
www.digitalpodcast.com/detail-The_Cell_Phone_Junkie-18937.html - Cached - Similar

Shameless self-promotion: Phil on The Cell Phone Junkie Unlocked ...

Mar 2, 2010 ... Pardon the interruption, just wanted to take a second to let you know that I
sat down with Mickey and Joey from The Cell Phone Junkie ...
www.wmexperts.com/shameless-self-promotion-phil-cell-phone-junkie-unlocked - Cached

EXHIBIT C
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS361...

3/10/2010

cell junkie - Google Search

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

cell junkie

Next

Search

Search within results - Language Tools - Search Help - Dissatisfied? Help us improve Try Google Experimental
Google Home - Advertising Programs - Business Solutions - Privacy - About Google

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS361...

3/10/2010

cell junkie idaho - Google Search

Page 1 of 2

Google

Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more

Web History | Search settings | Sign in

cell junkie idaho

Web Show options...

Search

Advanced Search

Results 1 - 10 of about 1,690,000 for cell junkie idaho. (0.27 seconds)

Pacific Northwest - Idaho Jeeps - Jeep Junkie- the Magazine for ...

Pacific Northwest - Idaho Jeeps Pacific Northwest. ... RCI Aluminum Fuel Cell AutoMeter
Gauges 4-point Air System Beard Seats 8274-50 Winch, Synthetic Line ...
jeepjunkie.com/forum/showthread.php?p=231 - Cached

Online Confessions of an Internet Junkie

(Some of these were taken with my cell phone so I apologize for bad quality). .... He of
course has it in Idaho. I've been getting calls 1-3 times a week ...
plaidlobster.blogspot.com/ - Cached

Sun Valley Idaho's ski, snow, restaurant, recreation, news ...

Mar 4, 2010 ... By The Gear Junkie atThe Outside Blog Gear Feed .... Is there personal
privacy in the age of the internet, cell phones and security cameras? ...
sunvalleyonline.com/.../the-gear-junkie-scoop-wenger-patagonia-gear - Cached

How Do We Avoid Becoming Info Junkies? on ADVANCE for Respiratory ...

We know we are gonners when cell phones, computer games, ... If we are on the guilty end
of being true info junkies, we do need to resolve to make better use of ... Idaho, Illinois,
Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts ...
respiratory-care-sleep-medicine.advanceweb.com/.../How-Do-We-Avoid-Becoming-InoJunkies.aspx - Cached

Would you pay big to jail a junkie? - mcall.com

Nov 8, 2009 ... (Some states -- notably Idaho, Montana and Utah -- have done ... A prison
cell isn't the only means by which to curtail personal freedom. ...
www.mcall.com/.../all-pc_5prison-overcrowding.7079600nov08,0,1928217.column - Cached

RebKell's Junkie Boards :: View topic - 2009-10 NCAAW fantasy league

30 posts - 6 authors - Last post: Nov 19, 2009
Yinka Olerinnfe, C of Idaho Ebony Ellis C of Northern Illinois ..... Then I looked up each
team's schedule and stuck an x in the cell for ...
boards.rebkell.net/viewtopic.php?p=753633&sid... - Cached

Political Junkie Blog : NPR

In the fall of 2002, from his prison cell, Traficant ran for Congress as an ...... Arkansas,
California, Delaware, Georgia, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, ...
www.npr.org/blogs/politicaljunkie/crime_and_punishment/ - Similar

Ski Bike Junkie: Why religion doesn't matter

Aug 11, 2009 ... Hawaii, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, and Idaho to be exact. ... Lately
these have fallen out of fashion, but cell phone sales are brisk. .... Ski Bike Junkie: I like
skis and bikes and putting them to good use. ...
www.skibikejunkie.com/2009/08/why-religion-doesnt-matter.html - Cached

Sun Valley Idaho's ski, snow, restaurant, recreation, news ...

Feb 26, 2010 ... The Gear Junkie Scoop: Wenger Patagonia Gear ... Is there personal
privacy in the age of the internet, cell phones and security cameras? ...
sunvalleyonline.neighborlogs.com/ - Cached

Zocor joint pain's Page - Mac Junkie

EXHIBIT D
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS361...

3/10/2010

cell junkie idaho - Google Search

Page 2 of 2

Zocor joint pain's Page on Mac Junkie. ... from missouri meant in american falls, idaho.
zocor joint pain - order buy zocor online without a prescription. ...
macjunkie.ning.com/profile/Zocorjointpain - Cached

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

cell junkie idaho

Next

Search

Search within results - Language Tools - Search Help - Dissatisfied? Help us improve Try Google Experimental
Google Home - Advertising Programs - Business Solutions - Privacy - About Google

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS361...

3/10/2010

EXHIBIT E

EXHIBIT F

EXHIBIT F

EXHIBIT F

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Electronic Filing System. http://estta.uspto.gov
ESTTA Tracking number:
Filing date:

Proceeding

IN THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE TRADEMARK TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
92052188

Party

Defendant
David R. Shymatta

Correspondence
Address

Submission

JARED W. ALLEN
BEARD ST. CLAIR GAFFNEY McNAMARA P.A.
2105 CORONADO DRIVE
IDAHO FALLS, ID 83404
UNITED STATES
[e-mail]
Answer

Filer's Name

Jared W. Allen

Filer's e-mail

[e-mail], [e-mail]

Signature

/s/ Jared W. Allen

Date

05/10/2010

Attachments

Shymatta Answer.pdf ( 30 pages )(1613417 bytes )

Papillon v. Shymatta - Exhibit D

ESTTA346446
05/10/2010

Papillon v. Shymatta - Exhibit E

Latest Status Info

Thank you for your request. Here are the latest results from the TARR web server.
This page was generated by the TARR system on 2011-04-26 18:58:19 ET
Serial Number: 77946630 Assignment Information

Trademark Document Retrieval

Registration Number: (NOT AVAILABLE)
Mark

(words only): THE CELL PHONE JUNKIE
Standard Character claim: Yes
Current Status: An opposition after publication is pending at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. For further
information, see TTABVUE on the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board web page.
Date of Status: 2010-12-02
Filing Date: 2010-02-27
Filed as TEAS Plus Application: Yes
Currently TEAS Plus Application: Yes
Transformed into a National Application: No
Registration Date: (DATE NOT AVAILABLE)
Register: Principal
Law Office Assigned: LAW OFFICE 116
Attorney Assigned:
SHANAHAN WILLIAM PATRICK
Current Location: 650 -Publication And Issue Section
Date In Location: 2010-06-24
LAST APPLICANT(S)/OWNER(S) OF RECORD
1. Papillon, Michael S

Papillon v. Shymatta - Exhibit F

http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=77946630[4/26/2011 4:03:01 PM]

Latest Status Info

Address:
Papillon, Michael S
4216 E Desert Marigold Dr.
Cave Creek, AZ 85331
United States
Legal Entity Type: Individual
Country of Citizenship: United States
Phone Number: 6023253215
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES
International Class: 041
Class Status: Active
Entertainment services, namely, providing a radio program in the field of Comment and criticism on cellular
equipment, cellular providers, and cellular accessories via a global computer network; Entertainment services, namely,
providing an on-going radio program in the field of Comment and criticism on cellular equipment, cellular providers,
and cellular accessories; On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring Comment and criticism on cellular equipment,
cellular providers, and cellular accessories
Basis: 1(a)
First Use Date: 2006-07-16
First Use in Commerce Date: 2006-07-16
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Disclaimer: "CELL PHONE"
MADRID PROTOCOL INFORMATION
(NOT AVAILABLE)
PROSECUTION HISTORY
NOTE: To view any document referenced below, click on the link to "Trademark Document Retrieval" shown
near the top of this page.
2010-12-02 - Opposition instituted for Proceeding
2010-08-24 - Extension Of Time To Oppose Received
2010-07-27 - Notice Of Publication E-Mailed
2010-07-27 - Published for opposition
2010-06-24 - Law Office Publication Review Completed
2010-06-24 - Assigned To LIE
2010-06-11 - Approved for Pub - Principal Register (Initial exam)
2010-06-10 - Teas/Email Correspondence Entered
http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=77946630[4/26/2011 4:03:01 PM]

Latest Status Info

2010-06-09 - Communication received from applicant
2010-06-09 - TEAS Response to Office Action Received
2010-06-09 - Notification Of Non-Final Action E-Mailed
2010-06-09 - Non-final action e-mailed
2010-06-09 - Non-Final Action Written
2010-06-02 - Assigned To Examiner
2010-03-03 - New Application Office Supplied Data Entered In Tram
2010-03-03 - New Application Entered In Tram
ATTORNEY/CORRESPONDENT INFORMATION
Correspondent
JOHN D TITUS
DICKINSON WRIGHT PLLC
5009 EAST WASHINGTON SUITE 125
PHOENIX, AZ 85034
Phone Number: 6023253215

http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=77946630[4/26/2011 4:03:01 PM]

Papillon v. Shymatta - Exhibit G

Papillon v. Shymatta - Exhibit H

Case 4:10-cv-00565-BLW Document 18

Filed 04/21/11 Page 1 of 10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO

DAVID SHYMATTA, dba CELL
JUNKIE;
Plaintiff,

Case No. 4:10-CV-00565-BLW
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND
ORDER

v.
MICHAEL PAPILLON, dba THE CELL
PHONE JUNKIE;
Defendant.

INTRODUCTION
The Court has before it Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal
Jurisdiction (Dkt. 9).
FACTUAL AND LEGAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff David Shymatta has owned the registered trademark “Cell Junkie” since
December 11, 2007. This trademark is classified for “retail store services featuring cell
phone accessories.” Compl., Ex. A, Dkt. 1-1 at 3. Defendant Michael Papillon, a resident
of Arizona, operates a website called “The Cell Phone Junkie.” Compl. at ¶ 2.
Mr. Shymatta, dba Cell Junkie, sells cell phone products and accessories. Cell
Junkie maintains a website, celljunkie.com, and sells products through various online
retailers such as ebay.com. Id. at ¶ 8.
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 1

Papillon v. Shymatta - Exhibit I

Case 4:10-cv-00565-BLW Document 18

Filed 04/21/11 Page 2 of 10

Mr. Papillon operates a blog, cellphonejunkie.com, which reviews cell phones, cell
phone accessories, and provides podcasts regarding cell phones that may be listened to for
free on the website. Id. at ¶ 11. Mr. Papillon’s website provides users with links to
retailers selling the products being reviewed and discussed, but does not directly sell
products or provide price comparisons. Id; Papillon Aff., Dkt. 9-2 at ¶ 11. The vast
majority of content on Mr. Papillon’s website is available for free to any user. Papillon
Aff., Dkt. 9-2 at ¶ 8. Mr. Papillon has never personally sold any tangible products through
his website. Id. at ¶ 10. Mr. Papillon’s website offers a “premium” podcast for direct
download to electronic devices, such as a personal computer or iPod, for a small fee, the
proceeds of which are dedicated entirely to website maintenance. Id. at ¶¶ 12-13. In
2009, the proceeds from these premium podcasts totaled $3,000. Id. at ¶ 15. Since July
2006, 0.07% of all premium podcast downloads from Mr. Papillon’s website have been
initiated by users in Idaho. Id. at ¶ 18. Mr. Papillon has never purchased any advertising
for his website, in Idaho or any other state. Id. at ¶ 20.
On February 5, 2010, Mr. Shymatta sent Mr. Papillon a cease and desist letter,
demanding cessation of the use of the domain name “thecellphonejunkie.com.” Id. at ¶
13. On February 27, Mr. Papillon applied to register the trademark “The Cell Phone
Junkie” for the purposes of entertainment services. Compl., Ex. F, Dkt. 1-7 at 2. On
March 11, 2010, Mr. Papillon initiated cancellation proceedings regarding Mr.
Shymatta’s registered “Cell Junkie” trademark with the United States Patent &
Trademark Office, alleging abandonment. Compl., Ex. D, Dkt. 1-5 at 1-2.
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 2

Case 4:10-cv-00565-BLW Document 18

Filed 04/21/11 Page 3 of 10

Mr. Shymatta filed his pro se complaint in this matter on November 15, 2010,
alleging causes of action for (1) federal trademark infringement under the Lanham Act,
15 U.S.C. § 1114; (2) false advertising, unfair competition, infringement, false
designation of origin, and passing off; (3) direct and contributory common law trademark
infringement; (4) direct and contributory common law unfair competition. Compl., Dkt.
1. On December 21, 2010, Mr. Papillon moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of
personal jurisdiction. Mtn. to Dismiss, Dkt. 9.
LEGAL STANDARD
In order to establish the existence of personal jurisdiction in a diversity case, the
plaintiff must show (1) that a statute of the forum confers personal jurisdiction over the
nonresident defendant, and (2) that the exercise of jurisdiction accords with federal
constitutional principles of due process. Haisten v. Grass Valley Medical Reimbursement
Fund, Ltd., 784 F.2d 1392, 1396 (9th Cir. 1986). The Idaho long-arm statute provides
that a person is subject to personal jurisdiction if, among other things, he transacts
business or commits a tortious act in Idaho and the alleged cause of action arises from
that transaction or act. I.C. § 5-514. The Idaho legislature, in adopting that statute,
intended to exercise all the jurisdiction available to the State of Idaho under the due
process clause of the United States Constitution. Doggett v. Electronics Corp. of Am., 93
Idaho 26, 30 (1969). Thus, the state and federal limits are coextensive. Data Disc, Inc. v.
Systems Technology Associates, Inc., 557 F.2d 1280, 1286 (9th Cir. 1977)
Contacts giving rise to personal jurisdiction in a given forum may be general or
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 3

Case 4:10-cv-00565-BLW Document 18

Filed 04/21/11 Page 4 of 10

specific. For general jurisdiction to exist over a nonresident defendant, the defendant
must engage in “continuous and systematic general business contacts,” Helicopteros
Nacionales de Colombia, S.A. v. Hall, 466 U.S. 408, 416 (1984) (citing Perkins v.
Benguet Consol. Mining Co., 342 U.S. 437 (1952)), that “approximate physical presence”
in the forum state, Bancroft & Masters, 223 F.3d 1082, 1086 (9th Cir. 2000). This is an
exacting standard because a finding of general jurisdiction permits a defendant to be
haled into court in the forum state to answer for any of its activities anywhere in the
world. Brand v. Menlove Dodge, 796 F.2d 1070, 1073 (9th Cir. 1986) (collecting cases
where general jurisdiction was denied despite defendants’ significant contacts with
forum). A commercially interactive website may satisfy general personal jurisdiction
under the “sliding scale” test. Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc., 130 F.3d 414, 417-19
(9th Cir. 1997) (citing Zippo Mfg. Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc., 952 F.Supp. 1119, 1124
(W.D. Pa. 1997)). Zippo described the test as follows:
[T]he likelihood that personal jurisdiction can be constitutionally exercised is
directly proportionate to the nature and quality of commercial activity that an
entity conducts over the Internet. . . . At one end of the spectrum are situations
where a defendant clearly does business over the Internet. If the defendant enters
into contracts with residents of a foreign jurisdiction that involve the knowing and
repeated transmission of computer files over the Internet, personal jurisdiction is
proper. At the opposite end . . . a defendant has simply posted information on an
Internet Web site which is accessible to [forum resident] users. . . . The middle
ground is occupied by interactive Web sites where a user can exchange
information with the host computer.
Zippo, 952 F.Supp. at 1124 (citations omitted).
To ascertain whether specific personal jurisdiction exists, this Court employs a

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 4

Case 4:10-cv-00565-BLW Document 18

Filed 04/21/11 Page 5 of 10

three-prong test to determine whether a party has sufficient minimum contacts to be
susceptible to specific personal jurisdiction:
(1) The non-resident defendant must purposefully direct his activities or
consummate some transaction with the forum or resident thereof; or perform some
act by which he purposefully avails himself of the privilege of conducting
activities in the forum, thereby invoking the benefits and protections of its laws;
(2) the claim must be one which arises out of or relates to the defendant’s
forum-related activities; and
(3) the exercise of jurisdiction must comport with fair play and substantial justice,
i.e. it must be reasonable.
Schwarzenegger v. Fred Martin Motor Co., 374 F.3d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 2004). The
plaintiff bears the burden on the first two prongs. If the plaintiff establishes both prongs
one and two, the defendant must come forward with a compelling case that the exercise of
jurisdiction would not be reasonable. Boschetto v. Hansing, 539 F.3d 1011, 1016 (9th
Cir. 2008) (internal quotation omitted).
The court may consider evidence presented in affidavits to assist it in its
determination and may order discovery on the jurisdictional issues. Data Disc, Inc. v.
Systems Technology Assoc., Inc., 557 F.2d 1280, 1285 (9th Cir. 1977). However,
[w]hen a district court acts on a defendant’s motion to dismiss without holding an
evidentiary hearing, the plaintiff need make only a prima facie showing of
jurisdictional facts to withstand the motion to dismiss. [ ] That is, the plaintiff need
only demonstrate facts that if true would support jurisdiction over the defendant.
Ballard v. Savage, 65 F.3d 1495, 1498 (9th Cir. 1995) (citations omitted) (alteration in
original); see also AT & T v. Compagnie Bruxelles Lambert, 94 F.3d 586, 588 (9th Cir.
1996) (where trial court rules on jurisdictional issue based on affidavits and discovery
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 5

Case 4:10-cv-00565-BLW Document 18

Filed 04/21/11 Page 6 of 10

materials without holding evidentiary hearing, plaintiff need only make prima facie
showing).
ANALYSIS
First, Mr. Papillon argues that his blog is insufficient to support a finding of
general personal jurisdiction in Idaho. Secondly, Mr. Papillon argues that he satisfies
neither of the first two prongs of the specific personal jurisdiction test because he has
never directed activities at this forum, and there are thus no forum-related activities form
which this matter may arise.
A.

General Personal Jurisdiction
Mr. Papillon’s blog is insufficient to meet the exacting standard of general

personal jurisdiction. Mr. Papillon has never had any substantial, continuous, or
systematic contacts with Idaho. He has never advertised, sold any tangible products to
any state, or maintained any relationships with retail vendors. Compare these minimal
contacts with those found sufficient by the Ninth Circuit in Gator.com Corp. v. L.L. Bean,
Inc., 341 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2003). In that case, L.L. Bean, a Maine corporation,
targeted advertising at California, maintained a highly interactive, commercially lucrative
website serving large numbers of California consumers, and maintained business
relationships with numerous California vendors. Id. at 1078. The few district courts to
have considered blogs specifically have found them insufficient to establish general
personal jurisdiction. See Miller v. Kelly, 2010 WL 4684029, *5 (D. Colo. November 12,
2010) (“Accordingly, the Court finds that Defendant’s authorship of a LiveJournal blog is
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 6

Case 4:10-cv-00565-BLW Document 18

Filed 04/21/11 Page 7 of 10

an insufficient basis for the exercise of general personal jurisdiction over her.”); Hudson
v. University of Puerto Rico, 2010 WL 1131462, *3 (D. Minn. March 23, 2010) (“[T]he .
. . blog in and of itself is insufficient to establish general jurisdiction over the
University.”).
Mr. Shymatta’s argument that Mr. Papillon maintains a commercially interactive
website available to Idaho users that falls at the extreme end of the Zippo sliding scale is
unavailing. Mr. Papillon does not manufacture, design, stock, sell, or ship any cell phone
related product; when he reviews a cell phone or related product, he provides a link to a
retailer that sells the product for the ease of the reader. No profit is received by Mr.
Papillon for these links. See Con-Way, Inc. v. CONWAYRACING.COM, 2009 WL
2252128, *2 (N.D. Cal. July 28, 2009) (“A passive website that merely provides links to
other sites, but does not itself sell products within a forum, is insufficient to confer
jurisdiction.”); Simplicity, Inc. v. MTS Prods., 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17626, *23-25
(E.D. Pa. Apr. 14, 2006) (“[The] website falls short of a commercially interactive site for
which personal jurisdiction is proper because it does not allow customers to purchase
products online – it merely provides the names and website links to retailers, etailers and
specialty stores which sell its products.”).
The fact that Mr. Papillon sells a small number of premium podcast subscriptions
advertised on his website does not render it commercially active. To subscribe, an
interested party must e-mail Mr. Papillon separately; the transaction is not conducted on
the website. See, e.g., Bensusan Restaurant Corp. v. King, 937 F. Supp. 295, 297
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 7

Case 4:10-cv-00565-BLW Document 18

Filed 04/21/11 Page 8 of 10

(S.D.N.Y. 1996) (no personal jurisdiction where passive website directed interested
parties to contact website operator independently). The podcasts are also available for
free listening on the website. At most, Mr. Papillon’s website falls into the middle
ground of the Zippo sliding scale because there is some minimal user interactivity.
Visitors to the website may post their own personal comments at the end of Mr.
Papillon’s blog posts. Such minimal interactivity, coupled with the lack of commercial
activity, is insufficient to convey general personal jurisdiction subjecting Mr. Papillon to
being “haled into court in the forum state to answer for any of its activities anywhere in
the world.” Brand, 796 F.2d at 1073.
B.

Specific Personal Jursidiction
Because Mr. Papillon’s non-commercial blog is insufficient to establish general

personal jurisidiction over him in Idaho, Mr. Shymatta must establish specific personal
jurisdiction. Mr. Shymatta cannot do so, because he has failed to establish the first two
requirements of the Schwarzenegger test.
1.

First Requirement - Purposeful Availment

“The non-resident defendant must purposefully direct his activities or consummate
some transaction with the forum or resident thereof; or perform some act by which he
purposefully avails himself of the privilege of conducting activities in the forum, thereby
invoking the benefits and protections of its laws.” Schwarzenegger, 374 F.3d at 802.
This requirement is referred to as purposeful availment, and requires a showing that a
defendant “(1) committed an intentional act, (2) expressly aimed at the forum state, (3)
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 8

Case 4:10-cv-00565-BLW Document 18

Filed 04/21/11 Page 9 of 10

causing harm that the defendant knows is likely to be suffered in the forum state.”
Menken v. Emm, 503 F.3d 1050, 1058 (9th Cir. 2007) (internal quotation omitted).
The complaint lacks any allegations that Mr. Papillon committed an intentional act
expressly aimed at Idaho. Specific personal jurisdiction is sought on the grounds that Mr.
Papillon’s website is accessible in Idaho. These allegations do not constitute an
intentional act aimed at Idaho. Compare Panavision Int’l., L.P. v. Toeppen, 121 F.3d
1316, 1322 (9th Cir. 1998) (cybersquatter who registered internet domain name and sent
letters to California address demanding remuneration on exchange for use of domain
name committed intentional act targeted at the forum), with Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio
Int’l Interlink, 284 F.3d 1007 (9th Cir. 2002) (operation of passive website insufficient
absent “something more”; in this case targeted advertising with the forum state).
2.

Second Requirement - Claims Arising out of Intentional Acts

The second requirement of the Schwarzenegger test is necessarily not met because
Mr. Papillon has not engaged in any intentional acts expressly directed at Idaho. Mr.
Shymatta claims that Mr. Papillon sued him in Idaho, but the record does not support this
allegation. Mr. Papillon did file a trademark cancellation action against Mr. Shymatta’s
trademark with the United States Patent & Trademark Office in Washington, D.C., but
this filing is not analogous to bringing a tort claim in Idaho against an Idaho resident.
CONCLUSIONS
Mr. Papillon’s non-commercial, minimally interactive blog is insufficient to
subject him to general personal jurisdiction in any forum. Because Mr. Papillon has
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 9

Case 4:10-cv-00565-BLW Document 18

Filed 04/21/11 Page 10 of 10

engaged in no intentional acts expressly directed at Idaho, specific personal jurisdiction is
also lacking in this matter.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED:
1.

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Dkt. 9) is

GRANTED.

DATED: April 21, 2011

Honorable B. Lynn Winmill
Chief U. S. District Judge

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER - 10