Arizona, State of et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 66

RESPONSE in Opposition re 60 MOTION for Hearing on Motion re 38 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, 31 MOTION to Intervene as Co-Plaintiffs by: A. Maricopa County; and B. Joy Rich in her official capacity as Assistant County Manager and Director of Maricopa MOTION for Leave to File Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed by Dennis K Burke, Eric Himpton Holder, Jr, United States Department of Justice, United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Risner, Scott)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

10
11 State of Arizona, et al.,

No. 2:11-cv-01072-SRB

12
13

Plaintiffs,
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
PROSPECTIVE INTERVENORS’
MOTION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
AND LEAVE TO FILE A BRIEF IN
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS

vs.

14 United States of America, et al.,
15

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21

Upon consideration of the Motion for Oral Argument on Motion to Intervene and
Leave to File a Brief in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, filed by Proposed
Intervenors Maricopa County and Joy Rich on December 14, 2011, see ECF Dkt. 60,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1