Arizona, State of et al v. United States of America et al

Filing 66

RESPONSE in Opposition re 60 MOTION for Hearing on Motion re 38 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, 31 MOTION to Intervene as Co-Plaintiffs by: A. Maricopa County; and B. Joy Rich in her official capacity as Assistant County Manager and Director of Maricopa MOTION for Leave to File Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss filed by Dennis K Burke, Eric Himpton Holder, Jr, United States Department of Justice, United States of America. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Risner, Scott)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 10 11 State of Arizona, et al., No. 2:11-cv-01072-SRB 12 13 Plaintiffs, [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PROSPECTIVE INTERVENORS’ MOTION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND LEAVE TO FILE A BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS vs. 14 United States of America, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 Upon consideration of the Motion for Oral Argument on Motion to Intervene and Leave to File a Brief in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, filed by Proposed Intervenors Maricopa County and Joy Rich on December 14, 2011, see ECF Dkt. 60, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?