Dyson Technology Limited et al v. Cornucopia Products LLC

Filing 1

COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $350.00, receipt number PHX 0970-6718742, filed by Dyson Technology Limited, Dyson Incorporated (submitted by William Maledon). (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK)

Download PDF
OSBORN MALEDON A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW 1 2 ______________________ 3 The Phoenix Plaza 21st Floor 2929 North Central Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2793 P.O. Box 36379 Phoenix, Arizona 85067-6379 Telephone Facsimile 602.640.9000 602.640.9050 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 William J. Maledon, Atty. No. 003670 Eric M. Fraser, Atty. No. 027241 OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. 2929 North Central Avenue Suite 2100 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2794 602-640-9000 wmaledon@omlaw.com efraser@omlaw.com Robert S. Shwarts (pending Pro Hac Vice) Robert A. Rosenfeld (pending Pro Hac Vice) Russell P. Cohen (pending Pro Hac Vice) ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 405 Howard Street San Francisco, California 94105-2669 415-773-5700 rshwarts@orrick.com rrosenfeld@orrick.com rcohen@orrick.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 14 15 16 Dyson Technology Limited; Dyson, Inc., 17 COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiffs, Demand for Jury Trial 18 vs. 19 Cornucopia Products, LLC, 20 21 Defendant. 22 23 24 25 Plaintiffs Dyson Technology Limited and Dyson, Inc. (collectively, “Dyson”) hereby demand a jury trial and allege as follows for its complaint against Defendant Cornucopia Products, LLC (“Cornucopia”): 26 27 28 4176413 1 PARTIES 2 1. Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited is a Private Limited Company 3 organized and existing under the laws of England and Wales, with its principal place of 4 business in Malmesbury, United Kingdom. 5 6 2. Plaintiff Dyson, Inc. is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois. 7 3. Upon information and belief, Cornucopia is an Arizona limited liability 8 company with its principal place of business in Maricopa County, Arizona. Cornucopia 9 may be served with process by serving its registered agent, Alpha Legal Forms & 10 Moreinc, 4500 E Speedway Blvd #31, Tucson, AZ 85712-5325. 11 12 4. Dyson is a leading innovator and provider of bladeless fan products throughout the world. 13 JURISDICTION AND VENUE 14 5. This is an action for patent infringement of U.S. Patents Nos. D602,143 (the 15 “'143 Patent,” Exhibit A), D605,748 (the “'748 Patent,” Exhibit B), 8,052,379 (the “'379 16 Patent,” Exhibit C), 8,092,166 (the “'166 Patent,” Exhibit D), under the patent laws of the 17 United States, Title 35 of the United States Code, including (but not limited to) 35 U.S.C. 18 § 271. 19 20 21 6. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Dyson’s claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 7. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Cornucopia. Cornucopia is 22 incorporated in and resident of this district and has consented and submitted to this 23 Court’s personal jurisdiction by suing Dyson, Inc. and Dyson Ltd. in this judicial district 24 on February 2, 2012 (Case 2:12-cv-00234-NVW) (“Related Action”). 25 8. Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C §§ 1391 and 1400(b) because 26 Cornucopia is a resident of this district, has its principal place of business in this district, 27 and is subject to personal jurisdiction in this judicial district. 28 2 1 2 BACKGROUND 9. Cornucopia is willfully infringing Dyson’s intellectual property by selling 3 blatant copies of Dyson’s innovative bladeless fans. A visual comparison of Cornucopia’s 4 fan and Dyson’s fan, as shown below, demonstrates the degree of copying. 5 Dyson 12 Inch Table Fan Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10. The copying of Dyson’s fan is so pervasive that many parts of Cornucopia’s 20 fan are interchangeable with the corresponding parts of Dyson’s fan. For example, 21 Cornucopia’s cylindrical air nozzle fits perfectly and locks into Dyson’s base. And 22 Dyson’s cylindrical air nozzle fits perfectly and locks into Cornucopia’s base. 23 11. Cornucopia’s copying of Dyson’s fan even extends to the number and 24 position of screws for various parts, and the precise shapes of intricate internal 25 components, which were designed by Dyson engineers. 26 27 12. Cornucopia’s copying of Dyson further extends to the figures of Dyson’s operating manual and assembly guide, as shown below. 28 3 1 Figures from Dyson and Cornucopia Operating Manuals 2 3 Dyson Cornucopia 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 1 Figures from Dyson and Cornucopia Operating Manuals 2 Dyson 3 Cornucopia 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13. In the Related Action, Cornucopia attempts to justify its willful 22 infringement of Dyson’s intellectual property by baselessly alleging antitrust violations 23 and tortious interference with business expectancy. The Related Action also seeks a 24 declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of four Dyson Technology 25 Limited utility patents: U.S. Patent No. 7,931,449 (the “'449 Patent”); U.S. Patent No. 26 7,972,111 (the “'111 Patent”); the '379 Patent; and the '166 Patent. 27 28 14. Dyson Technology Limited is not a party to the Related Action. When the Related Action complaint was filed, Dyson Technology Limited was unaware of 5 1 Cornucopia and no Dyson entity had possession of Cornucopia’s fan with which to 2 conduct an infringement analysis. Dyson did not locate a distributor of Cornucopia’s fan 3 until late March when it learned they were being sold by Bed Bath & Beyond. Dyson 4 acquired sample Cornucopia fans shortly thereafter. 5 15. The Related Action complaint contends that Dyson’s patents are invalid 6 over a prior art reference, Japanese Application No. S56-167897 (“JP '897,” attached 7 hereto as Ex. E). Cornucopia makes this allegation despite the fact that JP '897 was 8 disclosed to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“U.S. PTO”) in each of 9 Dyson’s patent applications that issued as the '449, '111, '379, and '166 Patents. 10 11 12 13 14 15 Significantly, the U.S. PTO issued Dyson’s patents in view of that reference. 16. Cornucopia further alleges in paragraphs 20 and 21 of the Related Action complaint that its fan is based on JP '897, stating: Cornucopia developed its own bladeless fan inspired by the Japanese invention. Cornucopia spent significant time and money analyzing the Japanese patent and creating its own bladeless fan. 16 This allegation is completely rebutted by the fact that Cornucopia’s fan is so closely 17 copied from Dyson’s fan that its parts are interchangeable. By comparison, as illustrated 18 below, Cornucopia’s product bears little resemblance to the fan disclosed in JP '897. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6 1 2 JP '897, Fig. 1 Dyson’s 12 Inch Table Fan Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17. In the Related Action, Cornucopia fails to address the full scope of Dyson’s 16 intellectual property rights with respect to bladeless fans. Cornucopia makes no 17 allegations against the valid and enforceable design patents (the '143 Patent and the '748 18 Patent) that it infringes. 19 18. Design patents protect the appearance of products as viewed by an ordinary 20 observer. The U.S. PTO found Dyson’s designs patentable over the designs shown in the 21 figures of JP '897. A simple visual comparison confirms that JP '897 has a substantially 22 different appearance than Dyson’s design patents and products. For example, JP '897 23 shows a narrow hula-hoop shaped nozzle whereas Dyson’s design patents disclose a much 24 deeper cylindrically shaped nozzle: 25 26 27 28 7 1 2 JP '897, Fig. 2 Dyson '143 Design Patent, Fig. 5 Dyson '748 Design Patent, Fig. 5 3 4 5 6 7 8 19. Cornucopia’s knockoff fan has Dyson’s cylindrically shaped nozzle and does not replicate the hula-hoop shaped nozzle of JP '897: 9 10 JP '897, Fig. 2 Nozzle of Dyson’s 12 Inch Table Fan Nozzle of Cornucopia’s 12 Inch Bladeless Fan 11 12 13 14 15 16 20. As a further example, the nozzle of JP '897 connects to a relatively narrow 17 neck, which thereafter flares out half-way down the base into a section that is about as 18 wide as the nozzle, whereas Dyson’s '143 design patent claims a fan base that is 19 substantially cylindrical and that does not flare out at the mid-section of the base: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8 1 Dyson '143 Design Patent, Fig. 3 JP '897, Fig. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 21. Cornucopia’s knockoff fan misappropriates the combination of a 16 cylindrically shaped nozzle on a substantially cylindrical base in the proportions of 17 Dyson’s design. Cornucopia’s fan does not employ the proportions or shapes of JP '897 18 with its narrow neck and flared-out base. 19 22. Since filing the Related Action, Cornucopia has begun selling its knockoffs 20 online and in a number of major retail outlets including Bed Bath & Beyond at less than 21 half the price of a comparably sized Dyson fan. 22 23 23. Cornucopia’s extensive intellectual property infringement is irreparably harming Dyson and must be stopped. COUNT 1: PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY CORNUCOPIA 24 25 24. Dyson incorporates paragraphs 1-23 as if fully set forth herein. 26 25. United States Patent No. D602,143, entitled “Fan,” was duly and legally 27 issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on October 13, 2009. 28 9 1 26. Dyson Technology Limited is the owner by valid assignment of the entire 2 right, title, and interest in and to the '143 Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under 3 the '143 Patent, including the right to recover damages for past infringement. 4 27. Cornucopia has been and is now making, using, selling, and offering for sale 5 within the United States, or importing into the United States, bladeless fans, including the 6 Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that infringes the '143 Patent. 7 8 '143 Patent, Fig. 1 Dyson 12 Inch Table Fan Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 28. Cornucopia has been contributing to the infringement of and/or actively 20 inducing the infringement of the '143 Patent by others by, among other things, distributing 21 or offering for sale products, including the Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that teaches 22 third parties to assemble and use said products in a manner that directly infringes the '143 23 Patent. 24 29. Dyson has no adequate remedy at law against Cornucopia’s acts of 25 infringement and Dyson will suffer irreparable harm unless Cornucopia is preliminarily 26 and permanently enjoined from its infringement of the '143 Patent. 27 28 10 1 30. On information and belief, Cornucopia has had knowledge of the '143 Patent 2 since at least February 2, 2012 and has not ceased its infringing activity. Cornucopia’s 3 infringement of the '143 Patent has been and continues to be willful and deliberate. 4 5 31. Cornucopia, by way of its infringing activity, has caused and continues to cause Dyson to suffer damages in an amount to be determined at trial. 6 COUNT 2: PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY CORNUCOPIA 7 32. Dyson incorporates paragraphs 1-31 as if fully set forth herein. 8 33. United States Patent No. D605,748, entitled “Fan,” was duly and legally 9 10 issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on December 8, 2009. 34. Dyson Technology Limited is the owner by valid assignment of the entire 11 right, title, and interest in and to the '748 Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under 12 the '748 Patent, including the right to recover damages for past infringement. 13 35. Cornucopia has been and is now making, using, selling, and offering for sale 14 within the United States, or importing into the United States, products, including the 15 Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that infringes the '748 Patent. 16 17 '748 Patent, Fig. 3. Nozzle from Dyson’s 12 Inch Table Fan 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11 Nozzle from Cornucopia’s 12 Inch Bladeless Fan 1 36. Cornucopia has been contributing to the infringement of and/or actively 2 inducing the infringement of the '748 Patent by others by, among other things, distributing 3 or offering for sale products, including the Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that teaches 4 third parties to assemble and use said products in a manner that directly infringes the '748 5 Patent. 6 37. Dyson has no adequate remedy at law against Cornucopia’s acts of 7 infringement and Dyson will suffer irreparable harm unless Cornucopia is preliminarily 8 and permanently enjoined from its infringement of the '748 Patent. 9 38. On information and belief, Cornucopia has had knowledge of the '748 Patent 10 since at least February 2, 2012 and has not ceased its infringing activity. Cornucopia’s 11 infringement of the '748 Patent has been and continues to be willful and deliberate. 12 13 39. Cornucopia, by way of its infringing activity, has caused and continues to cause Dyson to suffer damages in an amount to be determined at trial. 14 COUNT 3: PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY CORNUCOPIA 15 40. Dyson incorporates paragraphs 1-39 as if fully set forth herein. 16 41. United States Patent No. 8,052,379, entitled “Fan Assembly,” was duly and 17 18 legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on November 8, 2011. 42. Dyson Technology Limited is the owner by valid assignment of the entire 19 right, title, and interest in and to the '379 Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under 20 the '379 Patent, including the right to recover damages for past infringement. 21 43. Cornucopia has been and is now making, using, selling, and offering for sale 22 within the United States, or importing into the United States, products, including the 23 Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that infringe claims of the '379 Patent. In particular, 24 the Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan has a base, a body tiltable relative to the base. It 25 emits air flow from a nozzle, which comprises a Coanda surface. 26 44. Cornucopia has been contributing to the infringement of and/or actively 27 inducing the infringement of the '379 Patent by others by, among other things, distributing 28 or offering for sale products, including the Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that teaches 12 1 third parties to assemble and use said products in a manner that directly infringes the '379 2 Patent. 3 45. Dyson has no adequate remedy at law against Cornucopia’s acts of 4 infringement and Dyson will suffer irreparable harm unless Cornucopia is preliminarily 5 and permanently enjoined from its infringement of the '379 Patent. 6 46. Cornucopia has had knowledge of the '379 Patent since at least February 2, 7 2012 and has not ceased its infringing activity. Cornucopia’s infringement of the '379 8 Patent has been and continues to be willful and deliberate. 9 10 47. Cornucopia, by way of its infringing activity, has caused and continues to cause Dyson to suffer damages in an amount to be determined at trial. 11 COUNT 4: PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY CORNUCOPIA 12 48. Dyson incorporates paragraphs 1-47 as if fully set forth herein. 13 49. United States Patent No. 8,092,166, entitled “Fan,” was duly and legally 14 issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on January 10, 2012. 15 50. Dyson Technology Limited is the owner by valid assignment of the entire 16 right, title, and interest in and to the '166 Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under 17 the '166 Patent, including the right to recover damages for past infringement. 18 51. Cornucopia has been and is now making, using, selling, and offering for sale 19 within the United States, or importing into the United States, products, including the 20 Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that infringe claims of the '166 Patent. In particular, 21 the Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan has a nozzle with two facing surfaces, with one 22 biased towards the other, and spacers that space apart the facing surfaces. 23 52. Cornucopia has been contributing to the infringement of and/or actively 24 inducing the infringement of the '166 Patent by others by, among other things, distributing 25 or offering for sale products, including the Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that teaches 26 third parties to assemble and use said products in a manner that directly infringes the '166 27 Patent. 28 13 1 53. Dyson has no adequate remedy at law against Cornucopia’s acts of 2 infringement and Dyson will suffer irreparable harm unless Cornucopia is preliminarily 3 and permanently enjoined from its infringement of the '166 Patent. 4 54. Cornucopia has had knowledge of the '166 Patent since at least February 2, 5 2012 and has not ceased its infringing activity. Cornucopia’s infringement of the '166 6 Patent has been and continues to be willful and deliberate. 7 8 55. Cornucopia, by way of its infringing activity, has caused and continues to cause Dyson to suffer damages in an amount to be determined at trial. 9 10 11 PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Dyson prays for the following relief: A. A judgment in favor of Dyson that Cornucopia has infringed 12 literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims of the 13 '143 Patent; 14 B. A judgment in favor of Dyson that Cornucopia has infringed 15 literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims of the 16 '748 Patent; 17 C. A judgment in favor of Dyson that Cornucopia has infringed 18 literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims of the 19 '379 Patent; 20 D. A judgment in favor of Dyson that Cornucopia has infringed 21 literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims of the 22 '166 Patent; 23 E. A preliminary and permanent injunction, enjoining 24 Cornucopia and its officers, directors, agents, servants, 25 employees, affiliates, divisions, branches, subsidiaries, parents 26 and all others acting in concert or privity with any of them 27 from infringing, inducing the infringement of, or contributing 28 to the infringement of the '143, '748, '379, and '166 Patents; 14 1 F. An award to Dyson of the damages to which it is entitled 2 under 35 U.S.C. § 284 for Cornucopia’s past infringement and 3 any continuing or future infringement up until the date 4 Cornucopia is finally and permanently enjoined from further 5 infringement, including both compensatory damages and 6 treble damages for willful infringement; 7 G. A declaration that this is an “exceptional” case within the 8 meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285, entitling Dyson to an award of its 9 attorney’s fees, expenses, and costs; 10 H. A judgment and order requiring Cornucopia to pay Dyson the 11 costs incurred in bringing this action (including all 12 disbursements), as well as attorney’s fees as provided by 35 13 U.S.C. § 285; 14 I. 15 interest on damages; and 16 J. 17 20 21 22 Such other and further relief in law or in equity to which Dyson may be justly entitled. 18 19 An award to Dyson of pre-judgment and post-judgment JURY TRIAL DEMAND Dyson respectfully demands a trial by jury of any and all issues triable of right before a jury. DATED this 2nd day of May, 2012. OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. 23 24 25 26 27 By___s/William J. Maledon_____________ William J. Maledon Eric M. Fraser 2929 North Central Avenue Suite 2100 Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2794 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 28 15 1 Of Counsel: 2 Robert S. Shwarts (pending Pro Hac Vice) Robert A. Rosenfeld (pending Pro Hac Vice) Russell P. Cohen (pending Pro Hac Vice) ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 405 Howard Street San Francisco, California 94105-2669 415-773-5700 rshwarts@orrick.com rrosenfeld@orrick.com rcohen@orrick.com 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 16

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?