Dyson Technology Limited et al v. Cornucopia Products LLC
Filing
1
COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $350.00, receipt number PHX 0970-6718742, filed by Dyson Technology Limited, Dyson Incorporated (submitted by William Maledon). (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(REK)
OSBORN
MALEDON
A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
1
2
______________________
3
The Phoenix Plaza
21st Floor
2929 North Central Avenue
Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2793
P.O. Box 36379
Phoenix, Arizona 85067-6379
Telephone
Facsimile
602.640.9000
602.640.9050
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
William J. Maledon, Atty. No. 003670
Eric M. Fraser, Atty. No. 027241
OSBORN MALEDON, P.A.
2929 North Central Avenue
Suite 2100
Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2794
602-640-9000
wmaledon@omlaw.com
efraser@omlaw.com
Robert S. Shwarts (pending Pro Hac Vice)
Robert A. Rosenfeld (pending Pro Hac Vice)
Russell P. Cohen (pending Pro Hac Vice)
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2669
415-773-5700
rshwarts@orrick.com
rrosenfeld@orrick.com
rcohen@orrick.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
14
15
16
Dyson Technology Limited; Dyson,
Inc.,
17
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
INFRINGEMENT
Plaintiffs,
Demand for Jury Trial
18
vs.
19
Cornucopia Products, LLC,
20
21
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
Plaintiffs Dyson Technology Limited and Dyson, Inc. (collectively, “Dyson”)
hereby demand a jury trial and allege as follows for its complaint against Defendant
Cornucopia Products, LLC (“Cornucopia”):
26
27
28
4176413
1
PARTIES
2
1.
Plaintiff Dyson Technology Limited is a Private Limited Company
3
organized and existing under the laws of England and Wales, with its principal place of
4
business in Malmesbury, United Kingdom.
5
6
2.
Plaintiff Dyson, Inc. is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of
business in Chicago, Illinois.
7
3.
Upon information and belief, Cornucopia is an Arizona limited liability
8
company with its principal place of business in Maricopa County, Arizona. Cornucopia
9
may be served with process by serving its registered agent, Alpha Legal Forms &
10
Moreinc, 4500 E Speedway Blvd #31, Tucson, AZ 85712-5325.
11
12
4.
Dyson is a leading innovator and provider of bladeless fan products
throughout the world.
13
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
14
5.
This is an action for patent infringement of U.S. Patents Nos. D602,143 (the
15
“'143 Patent,” Exhibit A), D605,748 (the “'748 Patent,” Exhibit B), 8,052,379 (the “'379
16
Patent,” Exhibit C), 8,092,166 (the “'166 Patent,” Exhibit D), under the patent laws of the
17
United States, Title 35 of the United States Code, including (but not limited to) 35 U.S.C.
18
§ 271.
19
20
21
6.
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over Dyson’s claims pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
7.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Cornucopia. Cornucopia is
22
incorporated in and resident of this district and has consented and submitted to this
23
Court’s personal jurisdiction by suing Dyson, Inc. and Dyson Ltd. in this judicial district
24
on February 2, 2012 (Case 2:12-cv-00234-NVW) (“Related Action”).
25
8.
Venue is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C §§ 1391 and 1400(b) because
26
Cornucopia is a resident of this district, has its principal place of business in this district,
27
and is subject to personal jurisdiction in this judicial district.
28
2
1
2
BACKGROUND
9.
Cornucopia is willfully infringing Dyson’s intellectual property by selling
3
blatant copies of Dyson’s innovative bladeless fans. A visual comparison of Cornucopia’s
4
fan and Dyson’s fan, as shown below, demonstrates the degree of copying.
5
Dyson 12 Inch Table Fan
Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
10.
The copying of Dyson’s fan is so pervasive that many parts of Cornucopia’s
20
fan are interchangeable with the corresponding parts of Dyson’s fan. For example,
21
Cornucopia’s cylindrical air nozzle fits perfectly and locks into Dyson’s base. And
22
Dyson’s cylindrical air nozzle fits perfectly and locks into Cornucopia’s base.
23
11.
Cornucopia’s copying of Dyson’s fan even extends to the number and
24
position of screws for various parts, and the precise shapes of intricate internal
25
components, which were designed by Dyson engineers.
26
27
12.
Cornucopia’s copying of Dyson further extends to the figures of Dyson’s
operating manual and assembly guide, as shown below.
28
3
1
Figures from Dyson and Cornucopia Operating Manuals
2
3
Dyson
Cornucopia
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
1
Figures from Dyson and Cornucopia Operating Manuals
2
Dyson
3
Cornucopia
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
13.
In the Related Action, Cornucopia attempts to justify its willful
22
infringement of Dyson’s intellectual property by baselessly alleging antitrust violations
23
and tortious interference with business expectancy. The Related Action also seeks a
24
declaratory judgment of non-infringement and invalidity of four Dyson Technology
25
Limited utility patents: U.S. Patent No. 7,931,449 (the “'449 Patent”); U.S. Patent No.
26
7,972,111 (the “'111 Patent”); the '379 Patent; and the '166 Patent.
27
28
14.
Dyson Technology Limited is not a party to the Related Action. When the
Related Action complaint was filed, Dyson Technology Limited was unaware of
5
1
Cornucopia and no Dyson entity had possession of Cornucopia’s fan with which to
2
conduct an infringement analysis. Dyson did not locate a distributor of Cornucopia’s fan
3
until late March when it learned they were being sold by Bed Bath & Beyond. Dyson
4
acquired sample Cornucopia fans shortly thereafter.
5
15.
The Related Action complaint contends that Dyson’s patents are invalid
6
over a prior art reference, Japanese Application No. S56-167897 (“JP '897,” attached
7
hereto as Ex. E). Cornucopia makes this allegation despite the fact that JP '897 was
8
disclosed to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“U.S. PTO”) in each of
9
Dyson’s patent applications that issued as the '449, '111, '379, and '166 Patents.
10
11
12
13
14
15
Significantly, the U.S. PTO issued Dyson’s patents in view of that reference.
16.
Cornucopia further alleges in paragraphs 20 and 21 of the Related Action
complaint that its fan is based on JP '897, stating:
Cornucopia developed its own bladeless fan inspired by the Japanese
invention.
Cornucopia spent significant time and money analyzing the Japanese patent
and creating its own bladeless fan.
16
This allegation is completely rebutted by the fact that Cornucopia’s fan is so closely
17
copied from Dyson’s fan that its parts are interchangeable. By comparison, as illustrated
18
below, Cornucopia’s product bears little resemblance to the fan disclosed in JP '897.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
1
2
JP '897, Fig. 1
Dyson’s 12 Inch Table
Fan
Cornucopia 12 Inch
Bladeless Fan
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
17.
In the Related Action, Cornucopia fails to address the full scope of Dyson’s
16
intellectual property rights with respect to bladeless fans. Cornucopia makes no
17
allegations against the valid and enforceable design patents (the '143 Patent and the '748
18
Patent) that it infringes.
19
18.
Design patents protect the appearance of products as viewed by an ordinary
20
observer. The U.S. PTO found Dyson’s designs patentable over the designs shown in the
21
figures of JP '897. A simple visual comparison confirms that JP '897 has a substantially
22
different appearance than Dyson’s design patents and products. For example, JP '897
23
shows a narrow hula-hoop shaped nozzle whereas Dyson’s design patents disclose a much
24
deeper cylindrically shaped nozzle:
25
26
27
28
7
1
2
JP '897, Fig. 2
Dyson '143 Design Patent,
Fig. 5
Dyson '748 Design
Patent, Fig. 5
3
4
5
6
7
8
19.
Cornucopia’s knockoff fan has Dyson’s cylindrically shaped nozzle and
does not replicate the hula-hoop shaped nozzle of JP '897:
9
10
JP '897, Fig. 2
Nozzle of Dyson’s 12 Inch
Table Fan
Nozzle of Cornucopia’s
12 Inch Bladeless Fan
11
12
13
14
15
16
20.
As a further example, the nozzle of JP '897 connects to a relatively narrow
17
neck, which thereafter flares out half-way down the base into a section that is about as
18
wide as the nozzle, whereas Dyson’s '143 design patent claims a fan base that is
19
substantially cylindrical and that does not flare out at the mid-section of the base:
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
8
1
Dyson '143 Design
Patent, Fig. 3
JP '897, Fig. 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
21.
Cornucopia’s knockoff fan misappropriates the combination of a
16
cylindrically shaped nozzle on a substantially cylindrical base in the proportions of
17
Dyson’s design. Cornucopia’s fan does not employ the proportions or shapes of JP '897
18
with its narrow neck and flared-out base.
19
22.
Since filing the Related Action, Cornucopia has begun selling its knockoffs
20
online and in a number of major retail outlets including Bed Bath & Beyond at less than
21
half the price of a comparably sized Dyson fan.
22
23
23.
Cornucopia’s extensive intellectual property infringement is irreparably
harming Dyson and must be stopped.
COUNT 1: PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY CORNUCOPIA
24
25
24.
Dyson incorporates paragraphs 1-23 as if fully set forth herein.
26
25.
United States Patent No. D602,143, entitled “Fan,” was duly and legally
27
issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on October 13, 2009.
28
9
1
26.
Dyson Technology Limited is the owner by valid assignment of the entire
2
right, title, and interest in and to the '143 Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under
3
the '143 Patent, including the right to recover damages for past infringement.
4
27.
Cornucopia has been and is now making, using, selling, and offering for sale
5
within the United States, or importing into the United States, bladeless fans, including the
6
Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that infringes the '143 Patent.
7
8
'143 Patent, Fig. 1
Dyson 12 Inch Table Fan
Cornucopia 12 Inch
Bladeless Fan
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
28.
Cornucopia has been contributing to the infringement of and/or actively
20
inducing the infringement of the '143 Patent by others by, among other things, distributing
21
or offering for sale products, including the Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that teaches
22
third parties to assemble and use said products in a manner that directly infringes the '143
23
Patent.
24
29.
Dyson has no adequate remedy at law against Cornucopia’s acts of
25
infringement and Dyson will suffer irreparable harm unless Cornucopia is preliminarily
26
and permanently enjoined from its infringement of the '143 Patent.
27
28
10
1
30.
On information and belief, Cornucopia has had knowledge of the '143 Patent
2
since at least February 2, 2012 and has not ceased its infringing activity. Cornucopia’s
3
infringement of the '143 Patent has been and continues to be willful and deliberate.
4
5
31.
Cornucopia, by way of its infringing activity, has caused and continues to
cause Dyson to suffer damages in an amount to be determined at trial.
6
COUNT 2: PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY CORNUCOPIA
7
32.
Dyson incorporates paragraphs 1-31 as if fully set forth herein.
8
33.
United States Patent No. D605,748, entitled “Fan,” was duly and legally
9
10
issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on December 8, 2009.
34.
Dyson Technology Limited is the owner by valid assignment of the entire
11
right, title, and interest in and to the '748 Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under
12
the '748 Patent, including the right to recover damages for past infringement.
13
35.
Cornucopia has been and is now making, using, selling, and offering for sale
14
within the United States, or importing into the United States, products, including the
15
Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that infringes the '748 Patent.
16
17
'748 Patent, Fig. 3.
Nozzle from Dyson’s 12
Inch Table Fan
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
11
Nozzle from Cornucopia’s
12 Inch Bladeless Fan
1
36.
Cornucopia has been contributing to the infringement of and/or actively
2
inducing the infringement of the '748 Patent by others by, among other things, distributing
3
or offering for sale products, including the Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that teaches
4
third parties to assemble and use said products in a manner that directly infringes the '748
5
Patent.
6
37.
Dyson has no adequate remedy at law against Cornucopia’s acts of
7
infringement and Dyson will suffer irreparable harm unless Cornucopia is preliminarily
8
and permanently enjoined from its infringement of the '748 Patent.
9
38.
On information and belief, Cornucopia has had knowledge of the '748 Patent
10
since at least February 2, 2012 and has not ceased its infringing activity. Cornucopia’s
11
infringement of the '748 Patent has been and continues to be willful and deliberate.
12
13
39.
Cornucopia, by way of its infringing activity, has caused and continues to
cause Dyson to suffer damages in an amount to be determined at trial.
14
COUNT 3: PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY CORNUCOPIA
15
40.
Dyson incorporates paragraphs 1-39 as if fully set forth herein.
16
41.
United States Patent No. 8,052,379, entitled “Fan Assembly,” was duly and
17
18
legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on November 8, 2011.
42.
Dyson Technology Limited is the owner by valid assignment of the entire
19
right, title, and interest in and to the '379 Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under
20
the '379 Patent, including the right to recover damages for past infringement.
21
43.
Cornucopia has been and is now making, using, selling, and offering for sale
22
within the United States, or importing into the United States, products, including the
23
Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that infringe claims of the '379 Patent. In particular,
24
the Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan has a base, a body tiltable relative to the base. It
25
emits air flow from a nozzle, which comprises a Coanda surface.
26
44.
Cornucopia has been contributing to the infringement of and/or actively
27
inducing the infringement of the '379 Patent by others by, among other things, distributing
28
or offering for sale products, including the Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that teaches
12
1
third parties to assemble and use said products in a manner that directly infringes the '379
2
Patent.
3
45.
Dyson has no adequate remedy at law against Cornucopia’s acts of
4
infringement and Dyson will suffer irreparable harm unless Cornucopia is preliminarily
5
and permanently enjoined from its infringement of the '379 Patent.
6
46.
Cornucopia has had knowledge of the '379 Patent since at least February 2,
7
2012 and has not ceased its infringing activity. Cornucopia’s infringement of the '379
8
Patent has been and continues to be willful and deliberate.
9
10
47.
Cornucopia, by way of its infringing activity, has caused and continues to
cause Dyson to suffer damages in an amount to be determined at trial.
11
COUNT 4: PATENT INFRINGEMENT BY CORNUCOPIA
12
48.
Dyson incorporates paragraphs 1-47 as if fully set forth herein.
13
49.
United States Patent No. 8,092,166, entitled “Fan,” was duly and legally
14
issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on January 10, 2012.
15
50.
Dyson Technology Limited is the owner by valid assignment of the entire
16
right, title, and interest in and to the '166 Patent and possesses all rights of recovery under
17
the '166 Patent, including the right to recover damages for past infringement.
18
51.
Cornucopia has been and is now making, using, selling, and offering for sale
19
within the United States, or importing into the United States, products, including the
20
Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that infringe claims of the '166 Patent. In particular,
21
the Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan has a nozzle with two facing surfaces, with one
22
biased towards the other, and spacers that space apart the facing surfaces.
23
52.
Cornucopia has been contributing to the infringement of and/or actively
24
inducing the infringement of the '166 Patent by others by, among other things, distributing
25
or offering for sale products, including the Cornucopia 12 Inch Bladeless Fan, that teaches
26
third parties to assemble and use said products in a manner that directly infringes the '166
27
Patent.
28
13
1
53.
Dyson has no adequate remedy at law against Cornucopia’s acts of
2
infringement and Dyson will suffer irreparable harm unless Cornucopia is preliminarily
3
and permanently enjoined from its infringement of the '166 Patent.
4
54.
Cornucopia has had knowledge of the '166 Patent since at least February 2,
5
2012 and has not ceased its infringing activity. Cornucopia’s infringement of the '166
6
Patent has been and continues to be willful and deliberate.
7
8
55.
Cornucopia, by way of its infringing activity, has caused and continues to
cause Dyson to suffer damages in an amount to be determined at trial.
9
10
11
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Dyson prays for the following relief:
A.
A judgment in favor of Dyson that Cornucopia has infringed
12
literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims of the
13
'143 Patent;
14
B.
A judgment in favor of Dyson that Cornucopia has infringed
15
literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims of the
16
'748 Patent;
17
C.
A judgment in favor of Dyson that Cornucopia has infringed
18
literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims of the
19
'379 Patent;
20
D.
A judgment in favor of Dyson that Cornucopia has infringed
21
literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims of the
22
'166 Patent;
23
E.
A preliminary and permanent injunction, enjoining
24
Cornucopia and its officers, directors, agents, servants,
25
employees, affiliates, divisions, branches, subsidiaries, parents
26
and all others acting in concert or privity with any of them
27
from infringing, inducing the infringement of, or contributing
28
to the infringement of the '143, '748, '379, and '166 Patents;
14
1
F.
An award to Dyson of the damages to which it is entitled
2
under 35 U.S.C. § 284 for Cornucopia’s past infringement and
3
any continuing or future infringement up until the date
4
Cornucopia is finally and permanently enjoined from further
5
infringement, including both compensatory damages and
6
treble damages for willful infringement;
7
G.
A declaration that this is an “exceptional” case within the
8
meaning of 35 U.S.C. § 285, entitling Dyson to an award of its
9
attorney’s fees, expenses, and costs;
10
H.
A judgment and order requiring Cornucopia to pay Dyson the
11
costs incurred in bringing this action (including all
12
disbursements), as well as attorney’s fees as provided by 35
13
U.S.C. § 285;
14
I.
15
interest on damages; and
16
J.
17
20
21
22
Such other and further relief in law or in equity to which
Dyson may be justly entitled.
18
19
An award to Dyson of pre-judgment and post-judgment
JURY TRIAL DEMAND
Dyson respectfully demands a trial by jury of any and all issues triable of right
before a jury.
DATED this 2nd day of May, 2012.
OSBORN MALEDON, P.A.
23
24
25
26
27
By___s/William J. Maledon_____________
William J. Maledon
Eric M. Fraser
2929 North Central Avenue
Suite 2100
Phoenix, Arizona 85012-2794
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
28
15
1
Of Counsel:
2
Robert S. Shwarts (pending Pro Hac Vice)
Robert A. Rosenfeld (pending Pro Hac Vice)
Russell P. Cohen (pending Pro Hac Vice)
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
405 Howard Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2669
415-773-5700
rshwarts@orrick.com
rrosenfeld@orrick.com
rcohen@orrick.com
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
16
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?