Colletti v. Arpaio et al
Filing
5
ORDER Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2 ) is granted. As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filin g fee of $10.25. The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Order. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended com plaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 5/10/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Instructions and form for a prisoner filing a civil rights complaint)(KMG)
1
WO
KM
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Salvatori Joseph Colletti,
10
Plaintiff,
11
12
No. CV 13-222-PHX-RCB (SPL)
vs.
ORDER
Joseph M. Arpaio, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
Plaintiff Salvatori Joseph Colletti, who is confined in the Maricopa County Fourth
16
Avenue Jail, has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983
17
(Doc. 1) and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2). The Court will
18
dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend.
19
I.
Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee
20
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C.
21
§ 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
22
The Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $10.25. The remainder of the fee will
23
be collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income each time the
24
amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a
25
separate Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect and forward the
26
fees according to the statutory formula.
27
28
JDDL-K
1
II.
Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints
2
The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief
3
against a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28
4
U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff
5
has raised claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon
6
which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is
7
immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2).
8
A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the
9
pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8
10
does not demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-
11
defendant-unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.”
12
(2009). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere
13
conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Id.
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678
14
“[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a
15
claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly,
16
550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual
17
content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable
18
for the misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible
19
claim for relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw
20
on its judicial experience and common sense.” Id. at 679. Thus, although a plaintiff’s
21
specific factual allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must
22
assess whether there are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id.
23
at 681.
24
25
courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338,
26
342 (9th Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less
27
stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v.
28
JDDL-K
But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed,
Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam)).
-2-
1
If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other
2
facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal
3
of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The
4
Court should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of
5
advice “would undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v.
6
Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to
7
decide whether the court was required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court
8
will dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to state a claim, but because the Complaint
9
may possibly be saved by amendment, will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend.
10
III.
Complaint
11
Plaintiff names the following Defendants in the Complaint: Maricopa County
12
Sheriff Joseph M. Arpaio, Chaplain G. Millard, Sergeant Wade, Chaplain Paval, Jail
13
Sergeant Alger, Captain Harmon, and Lieutenant Garcia.
14
Plaintiff raises one claim for relief in which alleges that his First Amendment
15
rights are violated because he is denied a religious medallion. Plaintiff claims that when
16
he was transferred to the Maricopa County Jail, he was told that he would have to remove
17
his necklace. Plaintiff explained that the necklace was a religious item, but he was
18
nevertheless forced to relinquish it. Plaintiff filed grievances requesting the medallion.
19
Plaintiff claims that Sergeant A7344 approved the medallion if the chaplain would
20
provide it, but the jail chaplain responded by saying that he didn’t care about Plaintiff’s
21
religion and was not going to approve the medallion.
22
23
Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief as well as money damages.
IV.
Failure to State a Claim
24
25
that a defendant burdened the practice of plaintiff=s religion by preventing him from
26
engaging in a sincerely held religious belief and that the defendant did so without any
27
justification reasonably related to legitimate penological interests. Shakur v. Schriro, 514
28
JDDL-K
To state a First Amendment, free-exercise-of-religion claim, a plaintiff must allege
F.3d 878 (9th Cir. 2008).
-3-
1
Plaintiff does not allege that the denial of his religious medallion burdened the
2
practice of his religion by preventing him from engaging in a sincerely held religious
3
belief, nor does he allege that Defendants denied the medallion without a penological
4
justification. Plaintiff has therefore failed to state a claim.
5
V.
Leave to Amend
6
For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to
7
state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a
8
first amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will
9
mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If
10
Plaintiff fails to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended
11
complaint and dismiss this action without further notice to Plaintiff.
12
If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, Plaintiff must write short, plain statements
13
telling the Court: (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name
14
of the Defendant who violated the right; (3) exactly what that Defendant did or failed to
15
do; (4) how the action or inaction of that Defendant is connected to the violation of
16
Plaintiff’s constitutional right; and (5) what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of
17
that Defendant’s conduct. See Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976).
18
Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he names as a Defendant. If
19
Plaintiff fails to affirmatively link the conduct of each named Defendant with the specific
20
injury suffered by Plaintiff, the allegations against that Defendant will be dismissed for
21
failure to state a claim.
22
Defendants have violated a constitutional right are not acceptable and will be
23
dismissed.
Conclusory allegations that a Defendant or group of
24
Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First
25
Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its
26
entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original
27
Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count.
28
JDDL-K
-4-
1
A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet,
2
963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896
3
F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original
4
complaint as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised
5
in the original complaint is waived if it is not raised in a first amended complaint. King v.
6
Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).
7
VI.
Warnings
8
A.
9
Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his
10
release. Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he
11
intends to pay the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to
12
comply may result in dismissal of this action.
Release
13
B.
14
Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with
15
Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion
16
for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in
17
dismissal of this action.
Address Changes
18
C.
19
Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See
20
LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further
21
notice to Plaintiff.
Copies
22
23
Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff
24
fails to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the
25
dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
26
Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil
27
judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more
28
JDDL-K
D.
prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal
Possible “Strike”
-5-
1
in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous,
2
malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner
3
is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
4
E.
5
If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including
6
these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963
7
F.2d at 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any
8
order of the Court).
9
IT IS ORDERED:
Possible Dismissal
10
(1)
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is granted.
11
(2)
As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government
12
agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing
13
fee of $10.25.
14
(3)
The Complaint (Doc. 1) is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff
15
has 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in
16
compliance with this Order.
17
(4)
If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of
18
Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with
19
prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
20
21
22
(5)
The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a
civil rights complaint by a prisoner.
DATED this 10th day of May, 2013.
23
24
25
26
27
28
JDDL-K
-6-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?