Vacaneri et al v. Ryles et al

Filing 35

ORDER OF REMAND - that this action is remanded to the Maricopa County Superior Court. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 7/14/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Remand Letter)(KMG)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9
10

Veronica Vacaneri, et al.,

11

Plaintiffs,

12

vs.

13

Deputy Tehran Ryles, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. CV-13-02262-PHX-PGR
Mar.Cty.Sup.Ct. CV2013-094942
ORDER OF REMAND

16

The Court entered an Order (Doc. 34) requiring the parties to show cause by

17

July 11, 2014 why the Court, having dismissed the sole federal claim in this action,

18

should not decline to exercise its supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state

19

law claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3) (“The district courts may decline to exercise

20

supplemental jurisdiction over a claim under subsection (a) if - ... (3) the district court

21

has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction[.]”); Carnegie-Mellon

22

University v. Cohill, 484 U.S. 343, 350 n.7 (1988) (where all federal claims are

23

eliminated before trial, courts generally should decline to exercise supplemental

24

jurisdiction over remaining state law claims); Parra v. PacifiCare of Arizona, Inc., 715

25

F.3d 1146, 1156 (9th Cir.2013) (“[O]nce the district court, at an early stage of the

26

litigation, dismissed the only claim over which it had original jurisdiction, it did not

1

abuse its discretion in also dismissing the remaining state claims.”) A review of the

2

docket shows that no party has timely responded in any manner to the Show Cause

3

Order. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that this action is remanded to the Maricopa County Superior

4
5
6

Court.
DATED this 14th day of July, 2014.

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

-2-