Eldridge #147718 v. Schroeder

Filing 37

ORDER: Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Doc. 36 ) and untitled motion (Doc. 34 ); extending time to effect service of process to ninety (90) days from the date of filing of this Order; Clerk of the Court is directed to issue and send to Plaintiff five subpoenas duces tecum in blank. Plaintiff shall complete the subpoenas duces tecum requesting documents that would contain a current address for Defendant Schroeder and return the subpoenas duces tecum to the Clerk of Court on or be fore October 13, 2015. Upon receipt of the completed subpoenas, the Clerk of Court is directed to forward them to the U.S. Marshal for service. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:Plaintiff must complete the subpoenas such that the documents requested are ret urned to the Court, not to Plaintiff. Upon receipt of the documents, the Clerk of Court is directed to file the documents containing the address of Defendant Schroeder under seal. Upon receipt of the address of Defendant Schroeder, the Clerk of Cou rt is directed to complete a service packet and forward it to the United States Marshal for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 09/15/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Issued Subpoena 1, # 2 Issued Subpoena 2, # 3 Issued Subpoena 3, # 4 Issued Subpoena 4, # 5 Issued Subpoena 5) (REK)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Joseph Gerald Eldridge, Plaintiff, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV-14-01325-PHX-DGC (ESW) JD Schroeder, 13 Defendant. 14 15 16 The Court has considered Plaintiff’s untitled motion (Doc. 34) filed on June 25, 17 2015 and Motion to Compel (Doc. 36) filed on August 17, 2015. The motions are 18 deemed submitted for decision as no defendant has been served. 19 Plaintiff is a pro se prisoner confined in the Arizona State Prison Complex-Eyman 20 in Florence, Arizona. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint 21 (Doc. 21) which alleges a violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 22 1915(A)(a), the Court screened Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint and ordered 23 Defendant Schroeder to answer or otherwise respond by motion (Doc. 29). The United 24 States Marshal unsuccessfully attempted service (Doc. 33) on Defendant Schroeder at a 25 last known address filed under seal by the Attorney General (Doc. 26). Defendant 26 Schroeder is no longer employed at the Department of Corrections, and he has moved 27 from the residence listed as his last known address. 28 Plaintiff requests a variety of documents regarding Defendant Schroeder with the 1 intention of locating him for service of process. Therefore, the Court will grant Plaintiff 2 an extension of time to complete service and will permit the Plaintiff to conduct 3 reasonable discovery limited to ascertaining the requisite service information for 4 Defendant Schroeder, specifically Defendant Schroeder’s current address. The Marshal’s 5 inability to effect service on Plaintiff’s behalf is good cause for an extension of time to 6 complete service of process. Pruett v. Blanford, 912 F.2d 270, 276 (9th Cir. 1990). 7 Plaintiff may obtain Defendant Schroeder’s address through subpoenas. The Court will 8 provide Plaintiff with five subpoenas duces tecum which he may use to obtain the address 9 information. In view of the foregoing, the Court will deny the Plaintiff’s Motion to 10 Compel (Doc. 36) and untitled motion (Doc. 34). 11 Therefore, 12 IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel (Doc. 36) and untitled 13 14 15 motion (Doc. 34). IT IS ORDERED extending time to effect service of process to ninety (90) days from the date of filing of this Order. 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 17 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue and send to Plaintiff five subpoenas 18 duces tecum in blank. 19 2. Plaintiff shall complete the subpoenas duces tecum requesting documents that 20 would contain a current address for Defendant Schroeder and return the subpoenas duces 21 tecum to the Clerk of Court on or before October 13, 2015. 22 23 3. Upon receipt of the completed subpoenas, the Clerk of Court is directed to forward them to the U.S. Marshal for service. 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 25 1. Plaintiff must complete the subpoenas such that the documents requested are 26 27 28 returned to the Court, not to Plaintiff. 2. Upon receipt of the documents, the Clerk of Court is directed to file the documents containing the address of Defendant Schroeder under seal. -2- 1 3. Upon receipt of the address of Defendant Schroeder, the Clerk of Court is 2 directed to complete a service packet and forward it to the United States Marshal for 3 service. 4 4. Service shall be made within ninety (90) days of the date of this order at 5 Government expense by the United States Marshal or his authorized representative 6 pursuant to Rule 4(e)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to accomplish 7 service within this time period may result in dismissal of Plaintiff’s claims for failure to 8 serve pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 9 5. Defendant has twenty (20) days from the date of service within which to 10 answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil 11 Procedure. 12 Dated this 15th day of September, 2015. 13 14 15 Honorable Eileen S. Willett United States Magistrate Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?