Cagle #079874 v. Ryan et al
ORDER (Service Packet) - The objections are overruled and the 26 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted as follows; Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A, the following Counts of the 21 Second Amended Complaint are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PR EJUDICE: Counts 5-571, 572, 575-578, 580, 581, 584-593, 594-596, 597, 598, 602-607, 609-613, 619-704, 706-721, 722, 723-724, and 725. FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A, that the following Defendants are DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDI CE: Charles Ryan, Deputy Warden Unknown Black, Bobo, Brower, Darius, DeLacerta, DeMarco, Durazo, Guilfoyle, Heet, Keefe, Koeppel, Silvas, Smith, Squires, Swanda, Thompson, Valazquez and Washburn. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the followin g Defendants are required to respond to the following Counts of the 21 Second Amended Complaint: Defendants Corizon (Counts 1, 614, 615, 616, 617 and 618), Nurse Unknown Black (Count 1), Mares (Count 2), Henry (Counts 3 and 4), Vick lund (Counts 3 and 4), Unknown Transportation Officers Black 1 and 2 (Count 573), Babich (Count 574), Salas (Count 579), Bishop (Count 582), Vargas (Count 583), Sharp (Count 599), Berrellez (Counts 600 and 601), Laux (Count 608) and Roman (70 5). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that service on Defendants Corizon, Mares, Babis, Salas, Bishop, Berrellez, Henry, Vicklund, Vargas, Sharp, Roman and Laux is hereby ordered. The Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff a service packet including a sum mons and request for waiver forms, a copy of this Order, and a copy of Marshal's Process Receipt & Return form (USM-285) for each Defendant. Plaintiff has ninety days from the date of this order to move to amend to identify the fictitiously na med defendants, Defendants Unknown Transportation Officers Black 1 and 2 and Unknown Nurse Black, or such defendants shall thereafter be dismissed without prejudice. FINALLY ORDERED that Plaintiff's unilateral 30 motion to reassig n this case to Magistrate Judge Metcalf is denied. However, the Clerk's office shall send a Consent to Exercise of Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge form to Plaintiff and each Defendant, who may return them at their option. Sig ned by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 10/30/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Letter, # 2 Samples and Service Packet for Dft. 1, # 3 Service Packet for Dft. 2, # 4 Service Packet for Dft. 3, # 5 Service Packet for Dft. 4, # 6 Service Packet fo r Dft. 5, # 7 Service Packet for Dft. 6, # 8 Service Packet for Dft. 7, # 9 Service Packet for Dft. 8, # 10 Service Packet for Dft. 9, # 11 Service Packet for Dft. 10, # 12 Service Packet for Dft. 11, # 13 Service Packet for Dft. 12, # 14 Instructions, # 15 Consent Form)(ATD)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION
BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
(FOR USE IN CIVIL CASES WITH A MAGISTRATE JUDGE AS PRESIDER)
INSTRUCTIONS TO ALL PARTIES
ACTION REQUIRED WITHIN 14 DAYS
Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.7(a)(1), all civil cases will be randomly assigned to a U.S.
District Court Judge or to a U.S. Magistrate Judge.
When a case is filed and assigned to a Magistrate Judge, a consent form is provided to the individual or
attorney who is filing the case. On the form, consent may be given to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate
Judge by signing the consent section of the form. If all parties consent, the case will remain with the
Magistrate Judge, pursuant to Title 28, U.S.C. § 636(c)(1). These cases are assigned to a Magistrate
Judge for all purposes, including trial and final entry of judgment. Any appeal from a judgment
entered by the Magistrate Judge may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court.
Consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge is voluntary and no adverse consequences of any kind
will be felt by any party or attorney who objects to the assignment of a case to the Magistrate Judge.
The party filing the case or notice of removal is responsible for serving all parties with the
This case has been assigned to a Magistrate Judge. Therefore, pursuant to Local Rule of Civil
Procedure, 3.7(b), each party must execute and file within fourteen (14) days of its appearance either a
written consent to the exercise of authority by the Magistrate Judge under Title 28, U.S.C. § 636(c) or a
written election to have the action reassigned to a District Judge using the form provided.
If any party chooses the District Judge option, the case will be randomly reassigned to a U.S. District
Court Judge. To elect to have the case heard before a U.S. District Court Judge, the District Judge
Option section of the form must be completed.
Each party must file the completed consent form and certificate of service with the court no later
than 14 days after the filing of the Complaint, the filing of the Notice of Removal, or entry of
Attorneys and pro se parties who have been given permission to file electronically must e-file the form
using the appropriate restricted event located in the Other Documents category: Consent/Election
Form LRCiv 3.7(b). Pro se filers who have not been authorized to e-file should submit the completed
paper form to the Clerk’s Office. The completed consent form must be served by mail or handdelivery to all parties of record in the case.