Flowers #125290 v. Lawrence et al

Filing 27

ORDER (Service Packet): The Magistrate Judge's 19 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED. Plaintiff's 10 MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Count I of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH OUT PREJUDICE as to Defendants Shane and Coleman; Count I is not dismissed as to Defendants Young, Batchlor, and L. Marshall. Defendants Young, Batchlor, and L. Marshall shall answer Count I of the Amended Complaint. All Defendants shall answer Count II of the Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court shall file the proposed Amended Complaint. ORDERED the Clerk shall send Plaintiff the Court's Order and Service Packets for Defendants Young, Batchlor, L. Marshall, S. Lawrence, Contre as, Coleman, Dean, and Shane. Plaintiff shall complete and return the service packet to the Clerk within 21 days of the date of filing of this Order. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/31/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Service Packet Letter, # 2 SP1, # 3 SP2, # 4 SP3, # 5 SP4, # 6 SP5, # 7 SP6, # 8 SP7, # 9 SP8, # 10 Rule 4)(LFIG)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Eulandas J. Flowers, No. CV-14-08184-PCT-JAT Plaintiff, 10 11 v. 12 ORDER Sandra Lawrence, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) from the 19 Magistrate Judge, (Doc. 19), recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File an 20 Amended Complaint, (Doc. 10), be granted and that Defendants Shane and Coleman be 21 dismissed as to Count I of the proposed Amended Complaint. 22 Neither party filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts 23 and adopts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district 24 courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the 25 subject of an objection” (emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 26 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review 27 the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but 28 not otherwise” (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). 2 Therefore, 3 IT IS ORDERED that that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, 4 (Doc. 12), is ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED; 5 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, (Doc. 10), is GRANTED; 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Count I of the Amended Complaint is 8 DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to Defendants Shane and Coleman; Count I 9 is not dismissed as to Defendants Young, Batchlor, and L. Marshall; 10 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Young, Batchlor, and L. Marshall shall answer Count I of the Amended Complaint; 12 13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all Defendants shall answer Count II of the Amended Complaint; 14 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall file the proposed Amended Complaint lodged as Doc 11-1 as Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint; 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff the 17 Court’s Order, and a copy of the Marshal’s Process Receipt & Return form (USM-285) 18 and Notice of Lawsuit & Request for Waiver of Service of Summons form for 19 Defendants Young, Batchlor, L. Marshall, S. Lawrence, Contreas, Coleman, Dean, and 20 Shane; 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall complete and return the 22 service packet to the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of filing of the 23 Court’s Order. The United States Marshal will not provide service of process if 24 Plaintiff fails to comply with this Order; 25 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff does not either obtain a waiver 26 of service of the summons or complete service of the Summons and Amended 27 Complaint on a Defendant within 120 days of the filing of the Amended Complaint 28 or within 60 days of the filing of the Court’s Order, whichever is later, the action -2- 1 may be dismissed as to each Defendant not served. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); LRCiv 2 16.2(b)(2)(B)(i); 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Unites States Marshal is advised and 4 ordered as follows: 5 - 6 Complaint, and a copy of the Court’s Order for future use; 7 - 8 action and request waiver of service of the summons pursuant to Rule 4(d) of the Federal 9 Rules of Civil Procedure. The notice to Defendants must include a copy of the Court’s The United States Marshal must retain the Summons, a copy of the Amended The United States Marshal must notify Defendants of the commencement of this 10 Order; 11 - 12 summons. If a waiver of service of summons is returned as undeliverable or is not 13 returned by a Defendant within 30 days from the date the request for waiver was 14 sent by the Marshal, the Marshal must: The Marshall must immediately file signed waivers of service of the 15 (a) personally serve copies of the Summons, Amended Complaint, and the 16 Court’s Order upon Defendant pursuant to Rule 4(e)(2) of the Federal Rules 17 of Civil Procedure; and 18 (b) within 10 days after personal service is effected, file the return of 19 service for Defendant, along with evidence of the attempt to secure a waiver of 20 service of the summons and of the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service 21 upon Defendant. The costs of service must be enumerated on the return of service 22 form (USM-285) and must include the costs incurred by the Marshal for 23 photocopying additional copies of the Summons, Amended Complaint, or the 24 Court’s Order and for preparing new process receipt and return forms (USM-285), 25 if required. Costs of service will be taxed against the personally served Defendant 26 pursuant to Rule 4(d)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, unless otherwise 27 ordered by the Court; 28 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are advised and ordered as -3- 1 follows: 2 - 3 Complaint must return the signed waiver forms to the United States Marshal, not 4 the Plaintiff; 5 - 6 appropriate motion within the time provided by applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the 7 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 8 - 9 behalf it is filed. The Court may strike any answer, response, or other motion or paper 10 Any Defendant who agrees to waive service of the Summons and Amended Defendants must answer the Amended Complaint or otherwise respond by Any answer or response must state the specific Defendant by name on whose that does not identify the specific Defendant by name on whose behalf it is filed; 11 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is advised and ordered as follows: 12 A. 13 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with 14 Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion 15 for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in 16 dismissal of this action; Address Changes 17 B. 18 Because Plaintiff is currently confined in an Arizona Department of Corrections 19 unit subject to General Order 14-17, Plaintiff is not required to serve Defendants with a 20 copy of every document he filed or to submit an additional copy of every filing for use by 21 the Court, as would ordinarily be required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5 and 22 Local Rule of Civil Procedure 5.4. If Plaintiff is transferred to a unit other than one 23 subject to General Order 14-17, he will be notified of the requirements for service and 24 copies for the Court that are required for inmates whose cases are not subject to General 25 Order 14-17; Copies 26 C. 27 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of the Court’s Order, 28 including these warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Possible Dismissal -4- 1 Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (a district court may dismiss 2 an action for failure to comply with any order of the Court). 3 Dated this 31st day of March, 2015. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?