Sumpter v. Crittenden Hospital Association et al
Filing
97
ORDER granting as modified 91 Motion to extend discovery and have a status conference. Phase 1 discovery is extended until 18 December 2015. Joint report on scheduling issues needing resolution due by 2 October 2015. A conference will be held there after if need be. The briefing on class certification should continue. The parties should hold 6 June 2016 as a back up trial date. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/22/2015. (jak) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/22/2015: # 1 Main Document - Correct) (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
YOLANDA GOODMAN, On Behalf of Herself
and All Similarly Situated Persons
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 3:14-cv-229-DPM
CRITTENDEN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, INC.;
EUGENE K. CASHMAN, III; W. BRAD
McCORMICK; CIGNA HEALTH AND LIFE
INSURANCE CO.; JAMIE R. CARTER, JR.;
DAVID G. BAYTOS; DAVID RAINES, JR.;
JASON W. COLLARD; HERSCHEL F. OWENS;
ANDREW LUTTRELL; DONNA B. LANIER;
CAROL C. McCORMACK; KEITH M. INGRAM;
RANDALL CATT; WILLIAM JOHNSON;
LANNIE L. LANCASTER; JULIO P. RUIZ;
SHERRY L. LONDON; NESS S. SECHREST;
RANDY R. SULLIVAN; LEVEN WILLIAMS; and
METHODIST LE BONHEUR HEALTHCARE
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Goodman’s unopposed motion to extend discovery and have a status
conference, ¹ 91, is granted as modified. Phase 1 discovery is extended until
18 December 2015. Joint report on scheduling issues needing resolution due
by 2 October 2015. We’ll have a conference thereafter if need be. The Court
regrets that the press of other business has prevented it from deciding the
motions to dismiss. The Court hopes to rule on ¹ 61 and ¹ 69 by the end of
October. Meanwhile, briefing on class certification should continue. The
parties should hold 6 June 2016 as a back up trial date.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
22 September 2015
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?