Scott v. Maddlock et al
Filing
17
ORDER adopting 13 Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects. The Clerk is directed to send Mr. Scott a copy of each document he filed in this case. Mr. Scott's claims are dismissed, without prejudice, based on his f ailure to state a federal claim for relief. The dismissal counts as a "strike" and an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this order and judgment dismissing this action is frivolous and would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 9/11/2017. (jak) (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/11/2017: # 1 Main Document - Correct) (jak).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
JONESBORO DIVISION
ELVIN JOEL TYRON SCOTT
ADC #158250
V.
PLAINTIFF
3:17CV00198 JM/PSH
MADDLOCK, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has received and reviewed the Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”)
filed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. The parties have not filed objections. After a careful
review of the Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and
hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects.
The Clerk is directed to send Mr. Scott a copy of each document he filed in this case.
Mr. Scott’s claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on his failure to state a
federal claim for relief. The dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g),
and an in forma pauperis appeal taken from this order and judgment dismissing this action is
frivolous and would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 11th day of September, 2017.
________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?