Steinbuch v. Cutler et al

Filing 47

RESPONSE to 46 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 38 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, 44 MOTION to Dismiss, 36 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1), 43 Corporate Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1), 45 Brief in Support, filed by Jessica Cutler, Hyperion Books, Disney Publishing Worldwide and MOTION to Stay Discovery (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E# 6 Exhibit F)(Deere, Beth). (Docket text modified on 8/31/2006 to correct the description of document filed.)(thd) Modified on 8/31/2006 (thd, ).

Steinbuch v. Cutler et al

Doc. 47 Att. 4

Case 4:06-cv-00620-WRW

Document 47-5

Filed 08/30/2006

Page 1 of 1

Beth M. Deere
From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject:
Beth M. Deere Monday, August 21, 2006 3:44 PM `Jonathan Rosen' Philip S. Anderson; Clayborne S. Stone RE: Steinbuch v. Cutler et al

The thing is, I'm not going to agree to a 2 1/2 month extension if you're going to plow ahead with discovery. A defendant should not have to spend tons of money when it/he/she is not subject to personal jurisdiction. Beth.

IiI
EXHIBIT

Dockets.Justia.com