Coker v. Arkansas State Police et al

Filing 112

ORDER: The Court appreciates the parties' proposed jury instructions. The Court also appreciates, and will cover the gist of, Cartwright's proposed voir dire questions. The Court is attaching its current working drafts of (1) the preliminar y instructions, (2) the final instructions, and (3) the verdict form. We'll take these up Monday Morning. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/6/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Preliminary Instructions, # 2 Final Instructions, # 3 Verdict Form)(jak)

Download PDF
VERDICT 1. On Gabriel Coker’s excessive force claim against Brad Cartwright, as submitted in Instruction No. 8, we find for: ________ Gabriel Coker ________ Brad Cartwright If you found for Coker on Question 1, then answer Question 2. If you found for Cartwright on Question 1, your deliberations are done. Do not answer Question 2 or Question 3. 2. We find Gabriel Coker’s damages, as submitted in Instruction No. 9, to be $ _________ ___ If you found for Coker on Question 1, and awarded Coker compensatory damages on Question 2, then answer Question 3. 3. We assess punitive damages against Brad Cartwright of $________________ (state the amount, or, if none, write the word “none”). _________________________ Foreperson Court’s Working Draft - Verdict Form 6 February 2015 ______________________ Date Coker v. Cartwright 4:11-cv-867-DPM Court’s Working Draft - Verdict Form 6 February 2015 Coker v. Cartwright 4:11-cv-867-DPM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?