Moore v. Hill et al

Filing 62

ORDER: The Court appreciates the parties' pre-trial disclosure sheets and trial briefs. The Court is attaching its current working drafts of the preliminary instructions, the final instructions, and the verdict forms. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/12/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Preliminary Instructions, # 2 Final Instructions, # 3 Verdict Forms)(jak)

PRELIMINARY INSTRUCTIONS
COURT'S JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1.01
GENERAL: NATURE OF CASE; BURDEN OF PROOF;
DUTY OF JURY; CAUTIONARY
Ladies and gentlemen of the jury: I will take a few moments now to
give you some initial instructions about this case and about your duties as
jurors. During the trial, I will give you more instructions. And at the end of
the trial, I will give you further instructions. Unless I specifically tell you
otherwise, all these instructions- both those I give you now and those I give
you later- are equally binding on you and must be followed.
In this case, I am the judge of the law and the jury is the judge of the
facts. As the judge of the facts, it is your duty to determine the true facts from
the evidence and the reasonable inferences arising from the evidence. In
making your factual determinations, you must not engage in guess work or
speculation.
As I explained during voir dire, this is a civil case brought by Keith
Moore against four guards at the Arkansas Department of Correction-James
Hill, Lantz Goforth, Richard Lee, Charles Poole. Moore alleges that the
guards used excessive force against him. He says that he was sprayed with

Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

Page 1 of 17

Moore v. Hill et al.
5:12-cv-206-DPM

MK-4 OC spray, put under restraint, and then hit, kneed, punched, and
kicked. He says he was handled in a rough manner during transport causing
further injuries. Moore says that the guards saw the alleged attack, or knew
of the threat of an attack, and failed to protect him. The ADC guards say
Moore struck one of them first and that the force used in response was
reasonable, not excessive. The jury will decide, after hearing all the evidence,
what happened in the encounters between Moore and each of the ADC
guards and whether the United States Constitution was violated.
On the allegedly excessive-force claims: the Eighth Amendment to the

Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.

In particular, it

prohibits the use of excessive force against someone in custody. To prevail
on this claim, Moore must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a
particular ADC guard used physical force on him, that the force used was
excessive and applied maliciously and sadistically for the purpose of causing
harm, not in a good faith effort to achieve a legitimate purpose, and that as a
direct result Moore was injured. In determining whether the force was
excessive, you must consider several things: the need for the application of
force; the relationship between the need and the amount of force that was

Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

Page 2 of17

Moore v. Hill et al.
5:12-cv-206-DPM

used; the extent of the injury inflicted; and whether the force was used to
achieve a legitimate purpose or maliciously and sadistically for the purpose
of causing harm. Maliciously means intentionally injuring another without
just cause or reason. Sadistically means engaging in extreme or excessive
cruelty or delighting in cruelty.
On the failure-to-protect claims:

Moore must prove by a

preponderance of the evidence that one or more of the guards struck, kicked,
or used chemical spray against him, that a particular ADC guard was aware
of the substantial risk of an attack, that the guard- with deliberate
indifference to Moore's need to be protected- failed to protect him, and that
as a result Moore was injured. Deliberate indifference means knowing of a
substantial risk of harm and disregarding that risk by intentionally refusing,
or intentionally failing, to take reasonable measures to deal with the problem.
Negligence or inadvertence does not constitute deliberate indifference.
It will be your duty to decide from the evidence whether Moore is

entitled to a verdict against any of the defendant guards. You must consider
each of Moore's claims against each ADC guard separately. Some of Moore's
claims against some guards may not survive as a matter of law for one reason

Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

Moore v. Hill et al.

Page 3 of 17

5:12-cv-206-DPM

or another. That's for me to decide later. And I'll tell you in my final
instructions what particular claims you must decide.
This case should be considered and decided by you as a dispute
between persons of equal worth. All persons stand equal before the law and
are to be treated as equals.
From the evidence you will decide what the facts are. You are entitled
to consider that evidence in the light of your own observations and
experiences in the affairs of life. You will then apply those facts to the law
that I give you in these and in my other instructions, and in that way reach
your verdict. While you are the sole judges of the facts; you must follow the
law, as stated in my instructions, whether you agree with it or not. In
deciding what the facts are, you may have to decide what testimony you
believe and what testimony you do not believe. You may believe all of what
a witness says, or only part of it, or none of it.
In deciding what testimony to believe, consider the witnesses'
intelligence, their opportunity to have seen or heard the things they testify
about, their memories, any motives they may have for testifying a certain
way, their manner while testifying, whether they said something different at

Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

Moore v. Hill et al.

Page 4 of17

5:12-cv-206-DPM

an earlier time, the general reasonableness of their testimony, and the extent
to which their testimony is consistent with other evidence that you believe.
Do not allow sympathy or prejudice to influence you. The law demands
of you a just verdict, unaffected by anything except the evidence, your
common sense, and the law as I give it to you.
You should not take anything I may say or do during the trial as
indicating what I think of the evidence or what I think your verdict should be.

Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

PageS of17

Moore v. Hill et al.
5:12-cv-206-DPM

COURT'S JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1.02
EVIDENCE: LIMITATIONS

I have mentioned the word "evidence."

"Evidence" includes the

testimony of witnesses, the documents and other things received as exhibits,
and any facts that have been stipulated- that is, agreed to by the parties.
Certain things are not evidence. I will list those things for you now:
1.

Statements, arguments, questions, and comments by lawyers are

not evidence.
2.

Objections are not evidence. Lawyers have a right and sometimes

a duty to object or to move that certain evidence that has already been
received be stricken. If such an objection or such a motion to strike is made,
it will be my duty, as judge, to rule on the matter and determine whether you
jurors may take into consideration the challenged evidence. You are not to
concern yourself with the reasons for the attorneys' objections or motions to
strike or with the reasons for the Court's rulings. You also should not be
influenced by the objection or the motion to strike.
If I sustain an objection to a question or an exhibit, you must ignore the

question or the exhibit and must not try to guess what the information might
have been. Similarly, testimony and exhibits that I strike from the record, or
Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

Moore v. Hill et al.

Page 6 of 17

5:12-cv-206-DPM

tell you to disregard, are not evidence and must not be considered.
3.

Anything you see or hear about this case outside the courtroom

is not evidence. Furthermore, a particular item of evidence is sometimes
received for a limited purpose only. That is, it can be used by you only for
one particular purpose, and not for any other purpose. I will tell you when
that occurs and instruct you on the purposes for which the item can and
cannot be used.
Finally, some of you may have heard the terms direct evidence" and
II

II

circumstantial evidence." A fact is established by direct evidence when, for

example, it is proved by witnesses who testify to what they saw, heard, or
experienced. A fact is established by circumstantial evidence when its
existence can reasonably be inferred from other facts proved in the case. The
law makes no distinction between the weight to be given to direct and
circumstantial evidence.

Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

Page 7 of17

Moore v. Hill et al.
5:12-cv-206-DPM

COURT'S JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1.03
BURDEN OF PROOF

The burden of proving a fact is placed upon the party whose claim or
defense depends upon that fact. The party who has the burden of proving a
fact must prove it by a preponderance of the evidence. To prove something
by the preponderance of the evidence" is to prove that it is more likely true
II

than not true. It is determined by considering all of the evidence and deciding
which evidence is more believable.
If, on any issue of fact in the case, the evidence is equally balanced, you

cannot find that fact has been proved. The preponderance of the evidence is
not necessarily established by the greater number of witnesses or exhibits a
party has presented.
11

You may have heard of the term proof beyond a reasonable doubt."
This is a stricter standard, which applies in criminal cases. It does not apply
in civil cases like this one. You should, therefore, put it out of your minds.

Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

PageS of17

Moore v. Hill et al.
5:12-cv-206-DPM

COURT'S JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1.04
BENCH CONFERENCES

During the trial it will be necessary for me to speak with the lawyers out
of your hearing, either by having a bench conference here while you are
present in the courtroom, or by calling a recess. Please understand that while
you are waiting, we are working. The purpose of these conferences is to
decide how certain evidence is to be treated under the Rules of Evidence,
which govern the trial, and to avoid confusion and error. We will, of course,
do what we can to keep the number and length of these conferences to a
minimum.

Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

Moore v. Hill et al.

Page 9 of 17

5:12-cv-206-DPM

COURT'S JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1.05
NO TRANSCRIPT A V AILABLEfNOTE-TAKING

At the end of the trial you must make your decision based on what you
recall of the evidence. You will not have a written transcript to consult. You
must pay close attention to the testimony as it is given.
If you wish, however, you may take notes to help you remember what

witnesses said. If you do take notes, please keep them to yourself until you
and your fellow jurors go to the jury room to decide the case. And do not let
note-taking distract you so that you do not hear other answers by the witness.
The Clerk has provided each of you with a pad of paper and a pencil. At each
recess, leave your notes in your chair.
When you leave at night, your notes will be secured and not read by
anyone.

Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

Page 10 of 17

Moore v. Hill et al.
5:12-cv-206-DPM

COURT'S JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1.06
CONDUCT OF THE JURY

Finally, to insure fairness, you as jurors must obey the following rules:
First, as jurors, I do not want you to talk among yourselves about this

case, or about anyone involved with the case, until the end of the case when
you go to the jury room to deliberate and decide on your verdict.
Second, do not talk with anyone else about this case, or about anyone

involved with it, until the trial has ended and you have been discharged as
JUrors.
Third, when you are outside the courtroom, do not let anyone tell you

anything about the case, or about anyone involved with it. If someone does
try to talk to you about the case during the trial, please report it to me
immediately.
Fourth, during the trial you should not talk with or speak to any of the

parties, lawyers or witnesses involved in this case- you should not even pass
the time of day with any of them. It is important not only that you do justice
in this case, but that you also give the appearance of doing justice. If a person
from one side of the lawsuit sees you talking to a person from the other side
-even if it is simply to pass the time of day- an unwarranted and
Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

Moore v. Hill et al.

Page 11 of 17

5:12-cv-206-DPM

unnecessary suspicion about your fairness might be aroused. If any lawyer,
party or witness does not speak to you when you pass in the hall, ride the
elevator, or the like, remember it is because they are not supposed to talk or
visit with you.
Fifth, do not read any news stories, articles, or blogs about the case or

about anyone involved with it, or listen to any radio or television reports
about the case or about anyone involved with it.
Sixth, do not do any research or make any investigation about the case

on your own about any matter involved in this case. By way of example, that
means that you must not consult the Internet (e.g., Google or Wikipedia), a
dictionary, textbook, encyclopedia, or talk with a person you consider
knowledgeable. In fairness, you must only learn about this case from the
evidence you receive here at the trial and apply those facts to the law as I give
it to you.
Seventh, remember, cell phones are not permitted in the courtroom or

in the jury room.
Eighth, keep an open mind during the trial about what the verdict

should be. Keep an open mind until after you have heard all of the evidence.

Court's Working Draft12 August 2014

Page 12 of 17

Moore v. Hill et al.
5:12-cv-206-DPM

Once the trial has been completed and you have retired to the jury room to
decide the case, you and your fellow jurors are free to discuss the evidence
among yourselves.

Ninth, remember that you are not to be influenced in any degree by any
personal feelings or sympathy or prejudice for or against any of the parties or
the attorneys in the case. Each party is entitled to the same fair and impartial
consideration at your hands.

Tenth, no statement, remark, or ruling that I make or question that I
might ask of a witness during the course of the trial is intended to indicate
how I feel about the facts of the case. You, as the jurors, are the sole judges of
the facts of the case. You and you alone will have to decide upon the
believability and credibility of the witnesses and the weight and value of the
evidence.

Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

Moore v. Hill et al.

Page 13 of 17

5:12-cv-206-DPM

COURT'S JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 1.07
EXPANDED INSTRUCTION RE: JURY PROHIBITION ON
ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS/RESEARCH
During the trial, while you are in the courthouse and after you leave for
the day, do not provide any information to anyone by any means about this
case. For example, do not talk face-to-face or use any electronic device or
media, such as the telephone, a cell phone, a smart phone, Blackberry, PDA,
computer, the Internet, any Internet service, any text or instant messaging
service, any Internet chat room, blog, or website such as Facebook, MySpace,
YouTube, or Twitter, to communicate to anyone any information about this
case until I accept your verdict. Do not use the Internet to look up or research
anything about the case.
Ask each juror: Juror No. -, on your oath, do you promise not to post
anything about your jury service on any social media website such as
Facebook, Twitter, Myspace, or the like during the trial? On your oath, do
you promise not to use the internet to look up anything about the case, the
matters discussed, the lawyers, Moore, any of the defendants, me, or the
law?

Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

Page 14 of 17

Moore v. Hill et al.
5:12-cv-206-DPM

Remember, you have taken an oath to follow the rules, and you must
do so. If you do not, the case might have to be retried, and you could be held
in contempt of court and possibly punished.

Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

Page 15 of 17

Moore v. Hill et al.
5:12-cv-206-DPM

COURT'S INSTRUCTION NO. 1.08
OUTLINE OF TRIAL

The trial will proceed in the following manner:
First, Moore's lawyer will make an opening statement. Next, the
Defendants' lawyer will make an opening statement. An opening statement
is not evidence but is simply a summary of what the attorney expects the
evidence to be.
Moore will then present evidence by calling witnesses, and Defendants'
lawyers may cross-examine those witnesses. Following Moore's case, the
Defendants may present evidence by calling witnesses, and Moore may
cross-examine those witnesses.
Finally, Moore may offer rebuttal evidence.
After presentation of evidence is completed, the attorneys will then have
a second opportunity to address you directly, and on that second occasion,
they are permitted to argue to you the evidence in an attempt to persuade you
to their differing views of the true facts of the case.

As with opening

statements, closing arguments are not evidence.

Court's Working Draft 12 August 2014

Page 16 of 17

Moore v. Hill et al.
5:12-cv-206-DPM

After hearing closing arguments, the Court will give you the final
instructions on the law. Then you will retire to the jury room to deliberate on
your verdict.

Court's Working Draft12 August 2014

Page 17 of 17

Moore v. Hill et al.
5:12-cv-206-DPM