Reid v. Warrener et al

Filing 52

ORDER: The Court's working drafts of preliminary instructions, final instructions, and verdict forms are attached. Please study them. Be prepared at the 12 May 2014 pretrial to approve, object, and suggest changes as needed. The Court continues to wrestle with the substantive due process issues. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/9/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Preliminary Instructions, # 2 Jury Instructions, # 3 Verdict Forms)(jak)

Download PDF
VERDICT NO. 1 1. On Andrew Reid’s deliberate indifference claim against Mark Warner, as submitted in Instruction No. 8, we find for: ________ Andrew Reid ________ Mark Warner If you found for Reid on Question 1, then answer Question 2. If you found for Warner on Question 1, your deliberations on this claim are done. Do not answer Question 2 or Question 3. 2. We find Andrew Reid’s compensatory damages against Mark Warner to be $ _________ (state the amount, or if you find that Reid’s damages have no monetary value, put $1.00). If you found for Reid on Question 1, and awarded Reid compensatory damages on Question 2, then answer Question 3. 3. We assess punitive damages against Mark Warner of $________________ (state the amount, or, if none, write the word “none”). _________________________ Foreperson Court’s Draft Verdict Forms 9 May 2014 ______________________ Date Reid v. Warner et al. 5:12-cv-338-DPM VERDICT NO. 2 1. On Andrew Reid’s deliberate indifference claim against Crystal Woods, as submitted in Instruction No. 8, we find for: ________ Andrew Reid ________ Crystal Woods If you found for Reid on Question 1, then answer Question 2. If you found for Woods on Question 1, your deliberations on this claim are done. Do not answer Question 2 or Question 3. 2. We find Andrew Reid’s compensatory damages against Crystal Woods to be $ _________ (state the amount, or if you find that Reid’s damages have no monetary value, put $1.00). If you found for Reid on Question 1, and awarded Reid compensatory damages on Question 2, then answer Question 3. 3. We assess punitive damages against Crystal Wood of $________________ (state the amount, or, if none, write the word “none”). _________________________ Foreperson Court’s Draft Verdict Forms 9 May 2014 ______________________ Date Reid v. Warner et al. 5:12-cv-338-DPM VERDICT NO. 3 1. On Andrew Reid’s deliberate indifference claim against Vernon Robertson, as submitted in Instruction No. 8, we find for: ________ Andrew Reid ________ Vernon Robertson If you found for Reid on Question 1, then answer Question 2. If you found for Robertson on Question 1, your deliberations on this claim are done. Do not answer Question 2 or Question 3. 2. We find Andrew Reid’s compensatory damages against Vernon Robertson to be $ _________ (state the amount, or if you find that Reid’s damages have no monetary value, put $1.00). If you found for Reid on Question 1, and awarded Reid compensatory damages on Question 2, then answer Question 3. 3. We assess punitive damages against Vernon Robertson of $________________ (state the amount, or, if none, write the word “none”). _________________________ Foreperson Court’s Draft Verdict Forms 9 May 2014 ______________________ Date Reid v. Warner et al. 5:12-cv-338-DPM VERDICT NO. 4 1. On Andrew Reid’s substantive due process claim against Mark Warner, as submitted in Instruction No. 9, we find for: ________ Andrew Reid ________ Mark Warner If you found for Reid on Question 1, then answer Question 2. If you found for Warner on Question 1, your deliberations on Warner are done. Do not answer Question 2 or Question 3. 2. We find Andrew Reid’s compensatory damages against Mark Warner to be $ _________ (state the amount, or if you find that Reid’s damages have no monetary value, put $1.00). If you found for Reid on Question 1, and awarded Reid compensatory damages on Question 2, then answer Question 3. 3. We assess punitive damages against Mark Warner of $________________ (state the amount, or, if none, write the word “none”). _________________________ Court’s Draft Verdict Forms 9 May 2014 ______________________ Reid v. Warner et al. 5:12-cv-338-DPM Foreperson Date VERDICT NO. 5 1. On Andrew Reid’s substantive due process claim against Crystal Woods, as submitted in Instruction No. 9, we find for: ________ Andrew Reid ________ Crystal Woods If you found for Reid on Question 1, then answer Question 2. If you found for Woods on Question 1, your deliberations on Woods are done. Do not answer Question 2 or Question 3. 2. We find Andrew Reid’s compensatory damages against Crystal Woods to be $ _________ (state the amount, or if you find that Reid’s damages have no monetary value, put $1.00). If you found for Reid on Question 1, and awarded Reid compensatory damages on Question 2, then answer Question 3. 3. We assess punitive damages against Crystal Woods of $________________ (state the amount, or, if none, write the word “none”). Court’s Draft Verdict Forms 9 May 2014 Reid v. Warner et al. 5:12-cv-338-DPM _________________________ Foreperson ______________________ Date VERDICT NO. 6 1. On Andrew Reid’s substantive due process claim against Vernon Robertson, as submitted in Instruction No. 9, we find for: ________ Andrew Reid ________ Vernon Robertson If you found for Reid on Question 1, then answer Question 2. If you found for Robertson on Question 1, your deliberations on Robertson are done. Do not answer Question 2 or Question 3. 2. We find Andrew Reid’s compensatory damages against Vernon Robertson to be $ _________ (state the amount, or if you find that Reid’s damages have no monetary value, put $1.00). If you found for Reid on Question 1, and awarded Reid compensatory damages on Question 2, then answer Question 3. 3. We assess punitive damages against Vernon Robertson of $________________ (state the amount, or, if none, write the word “none”). Court’s Draft Verdict Forms 9 May 2014 Reid v. Warner et al. 5:12-cv-338-DPM _________________________ ______________________ Foreperson Date Court’s Draft Verdict Forms 9 May 2014 Reid v. Warner et al. 5:12-cv-338-DPM

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?