Reid v. Warrener et al
Filing
52
ORDER: The Court's working drafts of preliminary instructions, final instructions, and verdict forms are attached. Please study them. Be prepared at the 12 May 2014 pretrial to approve, object, and suggest changes as needed. The Court continues to wrestle with the substantive due process issues. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/9/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Preliminary Instructions, # 2 Jury Instructions, # 3 Verdict Forms)(jak)
VERDICT NO. 1
1.
On Andrew Reid’s deliberate indifference claim against Mark Warner,
as submitted in Instruction No. 8, we find for:
________ Andrew Reid
________ Mark Warner
If you found for Reid on Question 1, then answer Question 2. If you found
for Warner on Question 1, your deliberations on this claim are done. Do not
answer Question 2 or Question 3.
2.
We find Andrew Reid’s compensatory damages against Mark
Warner to be $ _________
(state the amount, or if you find that Reid’s damages have no monetary
value, put $1.00).
If you found for Reid on Question 1, and awarded Reid compensatory
damages on Question 2, then answer Question 3.
3.
We
assess
punitive
damages
against
Mark
Warner
of
$________________ (state the amount, or, if none, write the word
“none”).
_________________________
Foreperson
Court’s Draft Verdict Forms 9 May 2014
______________________
Date
Reid v. Warner et al.
5:12-cv-338-DPM
VERDICT NO. 2
1.
On Andrew Reid’s deliberate indifference claim against Crystal Woods,
as submitted in Instruction No. 8, we find for:
________ Andrew Reid
________ Crystal Woods
If you found for Reid on Question 1, then answer Question 2. If you found
for Woods on Question 1, your deliberations on this claim are done. Do not
answer Question 2 or Question 3.
2.
We find Andrew Reid’s compensatory damages against Crystal
Woods to be $ _________
(state the amount, or if you find that Reid’s damages have no monetary
value, put $1.00).
If you found for Reid on Question 1, and awarded Reid compensatory
damages on Question 2, then answer Question 3.
3.
We
assess
punitive
damages
against
Crystal
Wood
of
$________________ (state the amount, or, if none, write the word
“none”).
_________________________
Foreperson
Court’s Draft Verdict Forms 9 May 2014
______________________
Date
Reid v. Warner et al.
5:12-cv-338-DPM
VERDICT NO. 3
1.
On Andrew Reid’s deliberate indifference claim against Vernon
Robertson, as submitted in Instruction No. 8, we find for:
________ Andrew Reid
________ Vernon Robertson
If you found for Reid on Question 1, then answer Question 2. If you found
for Robertson on Question 1, your deliberations on this claim are done. Do
not answer Question 2 or Question 3.
2.
We find Andrew Reid’s compensatory damages against Vernon
Robertson to be $ _________
(state the amount, or if you find that Reid’s damages have no monetary
value, put $1.00).
If you found for Reid on Question 1, and awarded Reid compensatory
damages on Question 2, then answer Question 3.
3.
We
assess
punitive
damages
against
Vernon
Robertson
of
$________________ (state the amount, or, if none, write the word
“none”).
_________________________
Foreperson
Court’s Draft Verdict Forms 9 May 2014
______________________
Date
Reid v. Warner et al.
5:12-cv-338-DPM
VERDICT NO. 4
1.
On Andrew Reid’s substantive due process claim against Mark Warner,
as submitted in Instruction No. 9, we find for:
________ Andrew Reid
________ Mark Warner
If you found for Reid on Question 1, then answer Question 2. If you found
for Warner on Question 1, your deliberations on Warner are done. Do not
answer Question 2 or Question 3.
2.
We find Andrew Reid’s compensatory damages against Mark Warner
to be $ _________
(state the amount, or if you find that Reid’s damages have no monetary
value, put $1.00).
If you found for Reid on Question 1, and awarded Reid compensatory
damages on Question 2, then answer Question 3.
3.
We assess punitive damages against Mark Warner of
$________________ (state the amount, or, if none, write the word
“none”).
_________________________
Court’s Draft Verdict Forms 9 May 2014
______________________
Reid v. Warner et al.
5:12-cv-338-DPM
Foreperson
Date
VERDICT NO. 5
1.
On Andrew Reid’s substantive due process claim against Crystal
Woods, as submitted in Instruction No. 9, we find for:
________ Andrew Reid
________ Crystal Woods
If you found for Reid on Question 1, then answer Question 2. If you found
for Woods on Question 1, your deliberations on Woods are done. Do not
answer Question 2 or Question 3.
2.
We find Andrew Reid’s compensatory damages against Crystal Woods
to be $ _________
(state the amount, or if you find that Reid’s damages have no monetary
value, put $1.00).
If you found for Reid on Question 1, and awarded Reid compensatory
damages on Question 2, then answer Question 3.
3.
We assess punitive damages against Crystal Woods of
$________________ (state the amount, or, if none, write the word
“none”).
Court’s Draft Verdict Forms 9 May 2014
Reid v. Warner et al.
5:12-cv-338-DPM
_________________________
Foreperson
______________________
Date
VERDICT NO. 6
1.
On Andrew Reid’s substantive due process claim against Vernon
Robertson, as submitted in Instruction No. 9, we find for:
________ Andrew Reid
________ Vernon Robertson
If you found for Reid on Question 1, then answer Question 2. If you found
for Robertson on Question 1, your deliberations on Robertson are done. Do
not answer Question 2 or Question 3.
2.
We find Andrew Reid’s compensatory damages against Vernon
Robertson to be $ _________
(state the amount, or if you find that Reid’s damages have no monetary
value, put $1.00).
If you found for Reid on Question 1, and awarded Reid compensatory
damages on Question 2, then answer Question 3.
3.
We assess punitive damages against Vernon Robertson of
$________________ (state the amount, or, if none, write the word
“none”).
Court’s Draft Verdict Forms 9 May 2014
Reid v. Warner et al.
5:12-cv-338-DPM
_________________________
______________________
Foreperson
Date
Court’s Draft Verdict Forms 9 May 2014
Reid v. Warner et al.
5:12-cv-338-DPM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?